Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
massaman_yams
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Yep. Some similarity to TFDV too, but the UI here looks to be more or less lifted directly from Trifacta/Cloud Dataprep. pro: - Trifacta can be slow, and part of that might be the way it stores the data (I'm assuming js data struc
62.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Depends heavily on your use case, but there are a lot of advanced features. From a review last year (so some of this may be outdated): - Broader datasource support - 20 sources in Superset, vs 12 in Metabase Superset supports: - view creati
63.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Superset's very powerful, but other options can be easier for common use cases.
64.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Superset's not the best in terms of looks, but it beats Metabase hands down for functionality.
65.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
For single addresses that specifically request it, which is both fine and hugely different from bulk notifications to any/all addresses observed in a breach, which is what I was referring to. But I realize the wording in the original p
66.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Bulk emailing notifications to all affected addresses would be a deliverability nightmare, and would require manual intervention at most ISPs to prevent these messages from being blocked, which said ISPs may or may not be willing to do. Jus
67.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Right. Split up by IP/subdomain if possible, preferably within one provider. That said, you may be surprised by the number of large organizations that have a dozen or more services that send mail on their behalf, for various different
68.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
The other comments here don't quite tell the whole story; "I never had any problems" is anecdotal - there are plenty of legitimate senders who do run into deliverability issues. Using an ESP will generally simplify the amount
69.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
There's less of a clear line between bulk and "business" email than you might think, particularly prospecting email. Looks 1:1 in terms of content, but is sent in bulk and has tracking pixels. But other than that, I agree. Fr
70.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
That message going to spam is almost certainly an issue with the domain reputation of one or more of the URLs you included. Easy to test, really. Send her a new message with the same text as before, but without any URLs.
71.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
In short, stability. If the performance hit is low double digits, that may not even be noticeable for many use cases.
72.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
From the study: "Useful Mg compounds are those that have a sufficiently low first stability constant to be bioavailable and include magnesium acetate, chloride, citrate, gluconate, glycinate, lactate, malate, oxalate, succinate, sulpha
73.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Yeah, I can't imagine everything working perfectly when using various combinations of timescale/citus/pipelinedb functionality. cstore_fdw is... yeah, there might be other edge cases there, but frankly, it's not a partic
74.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
That's part of the effect, but I don't think you can reasonably claim it's most of it - demand for rental housing is still high.
75.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Simple. Demand for housing. Supply issues aside, a huge number of people want to live in the SFBA, and the rents reflect that.
76.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
This is the reason for measurements of intermodulation distortion and THD+N by frequency. A proper evaluation of, say, a power amplifier will look at a dozen, maybe a couple dozen different measurements; taken all together, these provide a
77.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Doing a task queue in an RDBMS is not as simple as some might think, though. https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/what-is-select-skip-lock...
78.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Ah, I suppose I come from a world where most models are automatically rebuilt at least daily, and sometimes as often as a few times an hour.
79.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
Good examples, but re: #1, do a lot of places really deploy models with a static distribution? It should be relatively trivial to calculate this directly from the data within most ML libraries/systems - using a static distribution seem
80.
▲
by
massaman_yams
7y ago
It's not just data format changes; model accuracy can be impacted by changes in the distributions of values, even if their types remain the same. That's why production ML systems should monitor for data drift, model accuracy, and
81.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
It's a certification, yes, but in practice it is arguably more effective from a marketing perspective than it is from a farming practices/audit perspective. You may be surprised by how many people think Organic == pesticide free,
82.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
It's not the best solution in cases of clear false positives, but they do provide a help document outlining what kind of practices result in reduced risk of these kinds of problems. (It's oriented toward high volume senders, but m
83.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
Definitely. I'd also look at pg version support (GCP is still on 9.6) and extension support.
84.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
DMARC already allows a domain owner to specify a recommended action (no action, quarantine, or reject) to take in the event an ISP receives a message that fails DMARC. This DMARC policy can be published at the subdomain level, and best prac
85.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
You're right; complaint rate and similar metrics tracking were implemented by major consumer email providers in the early 00s, if I recall correctly. The technique has been around long enough for those providers to have systems in plac
86.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
It's less about the presence of DMARC in general, so much as the fact that the presence of full DMARC alignment (even in the absence of a formal DMARC record) allows ISPs to make more confident assessments of that sender's reputat
87.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
Gmail and Yahoo will do retroactive classification to some extent, but not broadly. It's a little more common to defer delivery by varying amounts based on historical sender reputation, but again that impacts a minority of legitimate e
88.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
And allow the occasional obvious phish to deliver to the inbox.
89.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
BIMI is... sort of what you're looking for. https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-me...
90.
▲
by
massaman_yams
8y ago
Adding DMARC would put a stop to that.
More ›