masonic

58 ms·

511.
by masonic 6y ago
Almost all submits for this site are self- submits.
512.
by masonic 6y ago
This is a verbatim copy from this forum posting from 5 years ago: https://www.nairaland.com/2571623/windows-10-problems-soluti...
513.
by masonic 6y ago
This is a verbatim rip from https://www.gistreel.com/just-like-hiv-covid-19-may-never-go... who, in turn, credits Al Jazeera as its source.
514.
by masonic 6y ago
Another verbatim plagiarized article. From April 5: https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/2020/04/05/5e8a447d268e3e...
515.
by masonic 6y ago
This is plagiarized from BBC News, word for word. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52656808
516.
by masonic 6y ago
Their Careers search engine shows zero jobs in all of USA (270 worldwide).
517.
by masonic 6y ago
Republicans put their judges in power Four of the five "conservatives" were elected by Wisconsin voters at large.
518.
by masonic 6y ago
I've responded directly to that post with direct links to the relevant orders You're talking in circles. The point here is that you repeatedly said that Newsome's orders cites criminal statute law , e.g. "..
519.
by masonic 6y ago
No, it doesn't. Here are some case numbers: You say "No", as if the article says otherwise, then quote a different source altogether. I was addressing specifically what the article did and didn't reference. A
520.
by masonic 6y ago
The articles and their references don't quote any statute (the LADN has a list of defendants but no reference to criminal charges; the article specifies only that they are pursuing cutoff of utilities to those properties).
521.
by masonic 6y ago
People who actually care can drill down into the appropriate codes and see that your derisive tone is wholly unsupported by fact. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23164535 You have an ugly habit of trying to silence c
522.
by masonic 6y ago
Now, go read what those specific codes actually say . None are criminal statutes or encompass criminal statutes. 26602. "The sheriff shall prevent and suppress any affrays, breaches of the peace, riots, and insurrections that come to
523.
by masonic 6y ago
Actually, they don't. In fact, Newsome's Executive Orders refer only to GOV § 8567, which only refers to procurement powers of state agencies. It specifically does not create any criminal statute, which in CA happens to be a v
524.
by masonic 6y ago
Okay, which Code and which Section for CA?
525.
by masonic 6y ago
Immigration reform was not a quagmire the Obama administration was going to delve into So, you acknowledge that it's a "quagmire", not a benefit. The Democrats had the legislation all done and ready to go in the previ
526.
by masonic 6y ago
No, generally airports associated with cities are not in the cities. SFO isn't even in San Francisco county .
527.
by masonic 6y ago
In CA, municipal code encompasses both criminal and civil statutes. That link is paywalled, but the article title only refers to shutting off utilities.
528.
by masonic 6y ago
Which Code and Section?
529.
by masonic 6y ago
Even without any supporting statute law?
530.
by masonic 6y ago
In California, even shelves aren't shelf-stable. (Earthquake country)
531.
by masonic 6y ago
I don't see how he could be arrested given that none of this lockdown was implemented in criminal statute law. Fined , maybe, but even fines can be reversed by courts.
532.
by masonic 6y ago
All book links are Amazon affiliate links (tag=fivebooks001-20).
533.
by masonic 6y ago
https://hn.algolia.com/?query=How%20the%20Gap%20in%20the%20R...
534.
by masonic 6y ago
the large budget blow-outs that are 100% certain to follow That's way more of a BART tradition than Caltrain. Just look at the SFO and Oakland airport extension debacles, let alone the clusterfuck that is Santa Clara county rai
535.
by masonic 6y ago
There are limitations: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-tra...
536.
by masonic 6y ago
Loginwalled. How ironic.
537.
by masonic 6y ago
which invalidates the first Most USA registrars have no process for invalidating a submitted ballot once it's in the box.
538.
by masonic 6y ago
It allows them to pick up only those ballots of their party's registrants and return only them, leaving the others behind. Hence the law.
539.
by masonic 6y ago
If you're selective about who you help vote vs who you don't, it biases the result.
540.
by masonic 6y ago
(January 2020) Money was returned over two months ago, but the case continues: https://reason.com/2020/03/04/dea-returns-82k-life-savings-i...

More ›