3 ms·

The articles and their references don't quote any statute (the LADN has a list of defendants but no reference to criminal charges; the article specifies only th

The articles and their references don't quote any statute (the LADN has a list of defendants but no reference to criminal charges; the article specifies only that they are pursuing cutoff of utilities to those properties).

clouddrover 6y ago
> the article specifies only that they are pursuing cutoff of utilities to those properties No, it doesn't. Here are some case numbers: https://www.lacityattorney.org/post/feuer-charges-10-more-allegedly-non-essential-businesses-operating-in-violation-of-emergency-order https://www.lacityattorney.org/post/feuer-charges-10-more-al... Look up the criminal case summary using the case number: http://www.lacourt.org/criminalcasesummary/ui/index.aspx http://www.lacourt.org/criminalcasesummary/ui/index.aspx
- masonic 6y ago
  No, it doesn't. Here are some case numbers: You say "No", as if the article says otherwise, then quote a different source altogether. I was addressing specifically what the article did and didn't reference. Anyway, this confirms my earlier point about these articles not identifying a related state criminal statute. These charges are from the L.A. Administrative Code, and there is a statute specific to Los Angeles: "Sec. 8.77. Punishment of Violations. It shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or both, for any person, during a local emergency declared pursuant to this chapter, to: ... 8.77(b). Do any act forbidden by any lawful rule, regulation, order or directive issued pursuant to this chapter, if such act is of a nature as to give, or be likely to give, assistance to any national enemy, or imperil the lives or property of other inhabitants of this City, or to prevent, hinder or delay the defense or protection thereof."
  - clouddrover 6y ago
    > You say "No", as if the article says otherwise Yes, because the article says otherwise. > then quote a different source altogether Yes, it's additional information because you're still not getting it.

clouddrover 6y ago

> the article specifies only that they are pursuing cutoff of utilities to those properties No, it doesn't. Here are some case numbers: https://www.lacityattorney.org/post/feuer-charges-10-more-allegedly-non-essential-businesses-operating-in-violation-of-emergency-order https://www.lacityattorney.org/post/feuer-charges-10-more-al... Look up the criminal case summary using the case number: http://www.lacourt.org/criminalcasesummary/ui/index.aspx http://www.lacourt.org/criminalcasesummary/ui/index.aspx

masonic 6y ago
No, it doesn't. Here are some case numbers: You say "No", as if the article says otherwise, then quote a different source altogether. I was addressing specifically what the article did and didn't reference. Anyway, this confirms my earlier point about these articles not identifying a related state criminal statute. These charges are from the L.A. Administrative Code, and there is a statute specific to Los Angeles: "Sec. 8.77. Punishment of Violations. It shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or both, for any person, during a local emergency declared pursuant to this chapter, to: ... 8.77(b). Do any act forbidden by any lawful rule, regulation, order or directive issued pursuant to this chapter, if such act is of a nature as to give, or be likely to give, assistance to any national enemy, or imperil the lives or property of other inhabitants of this City, or to prevent, hinder or delay the defense or protection thereof."
- clouddrover 6y ago
  > You say "No", as if the article says otherwise Yes, because the article says otherwise. > then quote a different source altogether Yes, it's additional information because you're still not getting it.