masleeds

4 ms·

1.
by masleeds 2y ago
There are forks being maintained of Riak CS and Riak TS by TI Tokyo - https://github.com/ti-tokyo . The focus of the OpenRiak community for the moment is on Riak KV only.
2.
by masleeds 2y ago
I'm not sure though for how much longer it will continue to make sense for the project as-is to continue to roll riak_ensemble forward as part of future releases. As there are no contributors who have direct direct experience or knowl
3.
by masleeds 2y ago
When we get stuff together there will be a link from our discussions page - https://github.com/orgs/OpenRiak/discussions .
4.
by masleeds 2y ago
I would tend to agree, perhaps a decade ago it was easier to define the uniqueness of Riak, and now there are alternatives that offer similar guarantees. So the relevance of Riak is not as obvious. Also as we focus on stability on OpenRiak
5.
by masleeds 2y ago
The SOLR part has now been retired from the last few releases. Current development has been focused on improving the flexibility of secondary indexes. There was some funky stuff achieved by some users using overloaded 2i terms and distribu
6.
by masleeds 2y ago
Riak has been maintained through the post-basho years by engineers at some of its larger customers (disclaimer - including myself). The focus has been on trying to improve the stability of the database when subject to complex failure scenar
7.
by masleeds 7y ago
The claim relates specifically to the spine 2 project, and is as measured over the 5 years since it went live. There are a lot of systems which depend on Spine 2 for their own availability, it is not the sort of thing that can go down at a