masamune__

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by masamune__ 12y ago

   http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-20/dozens-of-... I want real statistics...anyone with interesting source?
2. 2.▲
   by masamune__ 12y ago

   Yeah, that's the quickest fix for some softwares but OpenBSD devs can be really 'uncompromising' when they consider some features broken/dangerous. That's how they managed to have "2 remote holes in default ins
3. 3.▲
   by masamune__ 12y ago

   Actually, libressl is practical drop-in replacement of openssl if you use only sane parts of openssl's functionality. Biggest problem now is some upstream softwares still depends on insanity Openbsd devs nuked away, like RAND_egd() or
4. 4.▲
   by masamune__ 12y ago

   Just out of curiosity, what's GPL advocates and FSF's attitude toward APIs and implementation? Since vmkernel uses glibc, it has to implement all the Linux system calls right? Were there any claims for GPLed programs' APIs be
5. 5.▲
   by masamune__ 12y ago

   It's not driver itself but clever module that VMware developed so they can use linux drivers. (In prev thread : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9153716 ) But VMK API is not just wrapper for linux drivers. You can
6. 6.▲
   by masamune__ 12y ago

   Please correct me or feed me link if I'm wrong, but I can't just donate/support this case if they don't elaborate more on VMware side's story. What has exactly happened? LWN's article sounds somewhat, well, &#x