Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
martinvanaken
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
Hi Sheff, I'm Martin, co-founder of PullReview. I'm interested in understanding why the SaaS is not a good solution for you. Is it because you are not using GitHub (or any other online forge)? Thanks for your interest anyway. Mart
2.
▲
Why you need a Definition of Done
(blog.8thcolor.com)
4 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
+1 to that one. Code Review should be Peer Review - it is not about a Senior reviewing a Junior it is about a developer reviewing the work of another one. The junior's questions may actually be as useful as advices (notably by forcing
4.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
Thanks, nice list, summarize a good part of the best practices in a short form. Will quote.
5.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
Hi, author here. I agree this may not be easy - but something can always be done. I've been in several situation. As a team leader facing junior developers, I did simply set-up rules. I explained them, but I had the power to enforce th
6.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
Great list (especially "off the top of your head"). Thanks a lot for sharing. Several of those can actually be implemented in an automated tool (styles, short variables, spacing, unused variables even). What's your take on au
7.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
I agree with you, and this is the reason why having small features and reviews for all of them helps. Groking a colleague's code is much simple if it is a small piece, and when you are reviewing his code regularly (and the other way ar
8.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
Its the whole point for me: even if I prefer managers that I can convince, I just call that "development". Replace: "feature is done but need to be tested or reviewed" by "feature is not done". The fall in the
9.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
Hi, OP here. Interesting list. I think I would approve most of your points, but never worked (or created) such a "proper" environments in my various teams. Could you share the kind of checklist you use? Or give an idea of the kind
10.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
This one should be recorded on http://www.codingconfessional.com/
11.
▲
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
Hi, I think both are actually useful. The CI is supposed to run the tests (even if I like to run some myself when reviewing), but I agree that starting the application is a part of the review - you should not stop at just looking at the cod
12.
▲
We don’t do code reviews to improve the code
(blog.8thcolor.com)
3 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
How our own workflow is driving PullReview
(blog.8thcolor.com)
2 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
Don't repeat yourself in your Rails views
(blog.8thcolor.com)
2 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
Use Rails partials without abusing them
(blog.8thcolor.com)
4 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
Code Rules are Lines, not Walls
(blog.8thcolor.com)
3 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
Why Code Style Matters
(blog.8thcolor.com)
3 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
Git is all about code reviews
(blog.8thcolor.com)
2 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
Dead code is rotting your codebase
(blog.8thcolor.com)
4 points
by
martinvanaken
13y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
What is the appropriate time for a code review?
(blog.8thcolor.com)
2 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
21.
▲
We need collective code ownership - and it sucks
(blog.8thcolor.com)
2 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
22.
▲
Puppet & Vagrant : Smarter / Better / Stronger
(blog.8thcolor.com)
1 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
23.
▲
Blog post : we were smart
(blog.8thcolor.com)
3 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
24.
▲
About being a team leader
(blog.8thcolor.com)
1 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
Fast(er) tests in Ruby & Rails
(blog.8thcolor.com)
1 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
26.
▲
Entrepreneurs are Employers
(blog.8thcolor.com)
1 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
My point (as another commenter pointed), was more that, as long as you do not put a lot of money in, you'll have ample opportunities to recover, even in the worst case. Especially in the market we are in. This does not invalid your point, a
28.
▲
Technical founders have nothing to lose
(blog.8thcolor.com)
9 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
12 comments
29.
▲
What we are paying for
(blog.8thcolor.com)
2 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
30.
▲
Networking in the Silicon Valley
(blog.8thcolor.com)
2 points
by
martinvanaken
14y ago
|
0 comments
More ›