marcopolo3333

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by marcopolo3333 4y ago

   And? before the internet those ideas didn't spread anyways or they were spread by a small number of media companies. Pre-internet was not this mythical golden age of an exchange of ideas. On the whole of it these small number of tech c
2. 2.▲
   by marcopolo3333 4y ago

   I would offer that the solution to increased litigation is reforming our civil courts to prevent their abuses.
3. 3.▲
   by marcopolo3333 4y ago

   Then build a town square that is publicly owned, we as society decided to wave our hands of the responsibility of making a publicly owned the internet for the convenience of allowing big tech do it for us. The solution is not force private
4. 4.▲
   by marcopolo3333 4y ago

   It still is a virtue and a right in the US. Freedom of speech is not about giving every idea and every person and equal platform to spread their ideas. It's not about forcing others to host/spread ideas they disagree with. I think
5. 5.▲
   by marcopolo3333 4y ago

   A common thread I see is a lot is people conflating freedom of speech and having a platform (more specifically an online one). Forcing private entities to host speech they don't want to goes against what I define as freedom of speech.