marauder016

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by marauder016 7y ago

   I was excited to see the article and the response to this post is really heartening. I will echo other comments by saying that your HN pitch is well-written. I do have a question: in conventional capture processes, the step that makes the p
2. 2.▲
   by marauder016 8y ago

   I'm surprised by the hype around for-profit direct-air capture (DAC) companies because, unlike afforestation or biochar, which produce useful products, there is a very small market for CO2. Somewhat ironically, the biggest market for
3. 3.▲
   by marauder016 9y ago

   Huh. Thanks for the clarification. Have you reached out to them to clarify their thinking here? What are the efficiency gains of burning forestry waste vs. crop residue? Also, what is the relative size of forestry waste vs crop residue, and
4. 4.▲
   by marauder016 9y ago

   Have you checked out Drawdown [0]? Biochar was #72 out of 80 solutions for magnitude of emissions reduction by 2050 emissions. I haven't gone through their numbers, but they found that biochar could displace only 0.81 GT of CO2 equival
5. 5.▲
   by marauder016 9y ago

   Congrats Gaurab and Sean! Excited to see your progress.
6. 6.▲
   Digitalization comes to the materials industry(cen.acs.org)

   2 points by marauder016 9y ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   by marauder016 10y ago

   Hi Sam — seems like 'Science' was removed as a category in RFS. Can you comment on this?