manuscreationis

11 ms·

61.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Believe it or not, this is standard electrical engineering. The breakers in your home breaker box operate the exact same way. A 20A breaker will trip once you exceed a certain threshold, which I believe is 16 or 17. They're rated to go to 2
62.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Another vote for CSS, but then again I've never actually tried to use COM Something about CSS prevents me from really grasping it and using it with any real skill. I mainly live off of designer friends and things I can cobble together with
63.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Same here - not looking, but it was a fun little diversion. Good luck!
64.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Run
65.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
If it wasn't readily apparent how little you "got it" before this post, saying "We just don't work hard enough" destroys any credibility you may have here. Sorry, but there's a difference between "working hard" to make sure your site looks
66.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Spoken like someone who has never had to spend hours and days toying with a single design element to get it to work in older versions of IE. HasLayout? BoxModel? These are not things that allow for "graceful degradation" These things are ho
67.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I guess my only rebuttal, not to be "that guy", is to remind you it's a free service, and you are in no way compelled to use it. There are alternatives, regardless of how widespread or popular they are, and you're free to use (or not use) a
68.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I will say, the way the article is worded, you could take from it that Skype might be trying to parse your active conversation to offer up contextually relevant ads, which to some people would be incredibly invasive, not to mention prone to
69.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I would feel better about the "Detailed Quality Checks" if that very same point didn't have an improperly formed </li> closing tag poking through...
70.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I wonder if they'll have an employee spend months in a room designing the perfect pizza box opening experience... Clean, minimalist design Notches to facilitate stacking while preventing damage No cheese on the cover Pizza does not shift wh
71.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Thats what I figure - which is why I think a carefully tempered response is the right one at first. But even if all you want is a size 6 mention, and he doesn't acknowledge or give you credit for your work, you should be prepared to make su
72.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
If you feel like hes really copied your work without giving you credit, approach him over email or twitter privately, and ask him to rectify it. Make sure you keep a copy of the original, infringing slideshow of his, incase he tries to chan
73.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Pretty cool, but I wonder how effective this becomes under large projects with hundreds of files. Definitely an interesting idea.
74.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
If you have a 64bit PC, use the one with 64bit on it. If not, use the "Regular" one. If you're unsure if you're 32bit or 64bit, right click on "My Computer" and go to properties. In there the OS will identify itself with 32 or 64bit.
75.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
There is a bit of an issue amongst the Python community about support between 2.7.x and 3.x.x Lots of things still only target/support the 2.7 releases, and 3.x.x stuff is only slowing coming around. I had read (via a link here on HN months
76.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
That isn't the point. No one here is saying that users shouldn't have better password policies. They should. What is being said is that having a devil-may-care attitude toward safe guarding your users account data is not ok. If you use your
77.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I would definitely say it's the responsibility of the application developer to secure user account information, in addition to being the nice/right thing to do.
78.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Thanks for posting this. Never heard of it before, but will be taking a look at it now.
79.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Since you made the same comment more than once in this thread, I'll reply to you here as well. This attitude is absolutely not ok. You need to make sure the security of users accounts if a top priority, even if your app is 100% trivial in
80.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
You really need to re-think this attitude toward security. It is absolutely your responsibility, as the developer of your application, to make security of user accounts an absolute priority. It doesn't matter what the purpose of your websit
81.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I would imagine it should be trivial to have the application automatically switch a user over to ssl when attempting to login, as a lot of applications do this. Maybe it's PGs way of teaching people to think about security by making it some
82.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
This is probably the worst possible response anyone could give with a question like this. I sincerely hope you're either joking, or in no way responsible for the security of user accounts wherever you happen to be employed.
83.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
>The whole point of objectify is that it actually makes it pretty reasonable to work this way right off the jump. I would have a hard time believing that it's really any more work to build an objectify app than it is to build a vanilla
84.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
When I was first trying to learn about rails, I asked a friend who had been developing in it for a while about things like DI, and separation of concerns. He told me that those were things you used in Java and .Net because the languages jus
85.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
> Is not instantiation etc a cross-cutting concern that violates SRP in this instance? Right. Which is why hes also recommending the use of DI. It's hard to strike a balance between a strong design which takes a lot of time to work with
86.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I'd agree that the check mark could be a little less dramatic.
87.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
It's not bad. When I saw it before going to the site, I said to myself "This should be the logo of a company that is offering assurance or 'verifying' something for the check mark to be so prominent", and I'm glad I was right. I think it wo
88.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Cool, thanks for the tip
89.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
I agree the "micro" benchmark isn't something people should look to as a definitive answer, but I don't think they should be outright dismissed either. If nothing else, they should be a jumping off point for real testing.
90.
by manuscreationis 14y ago
Seeing these numbers (although as the author states, the data needs to be taken with a grain of salt since he didn't try to set up a more "proper" test environment) really makes me want to take a serious look at vert.x, but what you mention

More ›