mansion7

16 ms·

121.
by mansion7 6y ago
A fair question would be: are other countries seriously considering erasing our historical heroes using judgments arrived at by modern day critical race/social justice theories, or just America? And why should USA be held to a differen
122.
by mansion7 6y ago
When "science", or the purveyors/promotors/evangelists thereof: tell you not to wear a mask, and then later tell you if you don't wear a mask you are a Nazi incel who is literally killing grannies... tell you Trump
123.
by mansion7 6y ago
Politically, they could almost be considered a single entity. Look at where corporate donations, corporate PACs, and employee donations go to. It's almost a one-party chart. Not to mention their "in-kind" contributions. Ba
124.
by mansion7 6y ago
What if that race is white? A private organization providing funds solely to white folks. Would it be a problem then? Wonder if Oakland would care in that circumstance. Probably not, right? After all this area is so notoriously color
125.
by mansion7 6y ago
And Antifa is just an idea.
126.
by mansion7 6y ago
One can be forgiven a lot of one's politics are correct, especially if one has the mitigating status of minority status, even if it's a minority status that one grants oneself and no one is allowed to question. We've just wit
127.
by mansion7 6y ago
Keeping in mind that those who set the policies are the same people who were literally crying in the hallways at work after the 2016 election And outright saying "WE lost" When Google, YouTube, et al make decisions that appear to
128.
by mansion7 6y ago
They must bend over and accept the blacklists, for our betters at Apple and Google have deemed some of the instances to be too naughty. They will ban the app from their stores if such access is allowed. Instead, one must access naughty co
129.
by mansion7 6y ago
There have been multiple news articles in the past few years of professors and activists (besides Elizabeth Warren) portraying themselves as minorities. It can only be concluded that they perceive a benefit to minority status over the so-ca
130.
by mansion7 6y ago
It's okay, Biden's press secretary assured us that this was perfectly legit and that Ms. Yellen had earned the money. I didn't see any CNN fact checkers or "lie counters" weighing in on it, so we should be fine.
131.
by mansion7 6y ago
We didn't decide that. Just like "we" didn't decide on "latinx" or "woman" or that "white lives matter" and the "ok" gesture were racist. Our "betters" decided those thin
132.
by mansion7 6y ago
It's hardly satire, unfortunately. In the old days, you had to have leaks like JournoList, GameJournoPros, or Wikileaks to find out the narrative mainstream journalists wanted to push. Now you need only read journo Twitter. They&#x
133.
by mansion7 6y ago
I decided it based upon reasoned perusal of available evidence, as any rational being must... But were I undecided, your "Antifa Inc. Pvt. Ltd." would be unlikely to sway me, as it mocks the very idea that Antifa organizes in any
134.
by mansion7 6y ago
It happened so gradually I wasn't sure if I was imagining it. Then I gave a shot using DuckDuckGo for a few days and boy was it apparent how far Google search has fallen. And to think I resisted DDG for so long based on the silly name,
135.
by mansion7 6y ago
Did you read the tweets they used as justification? A man simply saying "I'm not going to this event" allows them to suddenly become mind-readers and clairvoyants, able to not only read one's mind to determine what they
136.
by mansion7 6y ago
Not in my experience. That's why the distinction is made between "virtue signalling" and "actually being virtuous". It's more akin to showing up to a date wearing fancy clothes and driving an expensive, but bor
137.
by mansion7 6y ago
It's not. Flippant responses aside, Antifa went above and beyond standard protest response in suppression of and violence toward photojournalist.
138.
by mansion7 6y ago
Antifa actively attempted to block media from photographing rioters, looters, and arsonists, and attacked numerous photojournalists ho refused to comply.
139.
by mansion7 6y ago
Why, sure they are. They censored the president under phony pretenses. They've censored Senator Hawley's book. They censored other government officials from even uttering the name "Eric Ciaramella", even though he was
140.
by mansion7 6y ago
I'm a customer too, and the message was stupid. Too often "dog whistles" are tantamount to psychic messages or seances. Only mind-readers can hear them and only the "woke", be it psychically or socially, can defin
141.
by mansion7 6y ago
It most definitely is.
142.
by mansion7 6y ago
When the private industry can censor the government, or outright purchase them, the difference is blurred The 1984 comparisons are apt. We already see them unpersoning people and employing memory holes.
143.
by mansion7 6y ago
The same reason Snowden had to go there.
144.
by mansion7 6y ago
Absolutely false. Parker removed threats of violence. They did not remove free speech. The problem is the definition of "violence" "incitement" "hate" etc has become SO broad (at the urging of one side who wan
145.
by mansion7 6y ago
There are some people it is impossible to please. These people will tell you that your free speech is violence, then the next minute tell you that silence is violence. I've literally seen it claimed that mispronouncing someone's
146.
by mansion7 6y ago
Ah, interesting. Whatever could have prompted the boogaloo boys to burn down those buildings, smash those banks and Starbucks, and Rob those Foot Lockers?
147.
by mansion7 6y ago
Was it right wingers engaging in the "mostly peaceful protests" that led to dozens of deaths and many more injuries, over a billion in property damage, and lasted for 6+ months? Was it right wingers who said if they see their poli
148.
by mansion7 6y ago
There are literally dozens of examples of high-ranking Democrats, not or mention the liberal punditry, claiming the 2016 election was illegitimate and that direct action should be taken against the president, his staffers, and his voters. Y
149.
by mansion7 6y ago
There were many other options. The justification they used for banning him was based upon mind-reading and weasel words. "the President’s statements can be mobilized by different audiences" So can any number of statements from Dem
150.
by mansion7 6y ago
Agreed, seems one could more accurately diagnose the so-called SJWs with Munchausen by proxy. Though they are known to invent entirely new classes of victim into which categories they conveniently happen to fall.

More ›