4 ms·
Was it right wingers engaging in the "mostly peaceful protests" that led to dozens of deaths and many more injuries, over a billion in property damage, and last
by mansion7 6y ago
Was it right wingers engaging in the "mostly peaceful protests" that led to dozens of deaths and many more injuries, over a billion in property damage, and lasted for 6+ months?
Was it right wingers who said if they see their political enemies "in a restaurant, in a Department Store, in a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd! You push back on them! You tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere!”
Or
"you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere!"
Or for
"unrest on the streets”
Or said that the rioting/looting/arson was
"not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after election day. They’re not gonna let up and they should not.”
Or
“I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country. And maybe there will be"
Or simply call their political opposition "Nazis" and then, separately, explain violence against Nazi's is justified?
Hint: the answer is no.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> Was it right wingers engaging in the "mostly peaceful protests" that led to dozens of deaths and many more injuries, over a billion in property damage, and lasted for 6+ months? It was in many cases right-wingers (in some cases, IIRC, specifically associated with and motivated by the Boogaloo movement) committing violent acts concurrent with the actually-peaceful protests. They weren't actually participating with the protests, though.
- mansion7 6y agoAh, interesting. Whatever could have prompted the boogaloo boys to burn down those buildings, smash those banks and Starbucks, and Rob those Foot Lockers?