mandel_x

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mandel_x 7mo ago

   > people have been submitting so many Show HNs of generated projects In this case, it was more of write the X language compiler using X. I had to prove to myself if keeping the session made sense, and what better way to do it than to vi
2. 2.▲
   by mandel_x 7mo ago

   You are 100% and that’s why I chose git notes. If you do not sync them you have no knowledge of their existence.
3. 3.▲
   by mandel_x 7mo ago

   I added an action that will add a comment with the notes in GitHub so that you can see them directly. I did work around squash to collect all sessions and concatenate them as a single one
4. 4.▲
   by mandel_x 7mo ago

   People won’t do that, unfortunately. We are a dying breed (I hate it). I went against my own instincts and vibe code this, works as a proof of concept. You can see the session (including my typos) and compare what was asked for and what you
5. 5.▲
   If AI writes code, should the session be part of the commit?(github.com)

   497 points by mandel_x 7mo ago|391 comments
6. 6.▲
   by mandel_x 7mo ago

   I’ve been thinking about a simple problem: We’re increasingly merging AI-assisted code into production, but we rarely preserve the thing that actually produced it — the session. Six months later, when debugging or reviewing history, the onl