mam2

19 ms·

121.
by mam2 6y ago
I would just flee to another continent
122.
by mam2 6y ago
Investing in it now would make it cheaper on the long term
123.
by mam2 6y ago
they've been heavily moderating through bots. i really don't think they saw your message at all.
124.
by mam2 6y ago
Yes and that's why the short interest is still high.. they took more cash to short when it was at 450 / 300. Basic hedging
125.
by mam2 6y ago
It's cost, BECAUSE environmentalists have slowed down innovation through fear-mongering.. If it was any other industries it would be cheaper.
126.
by mam2 6y ago
Less than coal, oil and even hydropower per KW.h. https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
127.
by mam2 6y ago
It's not 50/50 but you can win 10x sometimes.. What people can't accept is that there IS some people who have made consistent gains on options. You just don't have play all the time and you should always have many factor
128.
by mam2 6y ago
i understand what you mean, but why would you say that when it's dumping ?
129.
by mam2 6y ago
The current (and historical pitch has always be to "cause a short squeeze and hold indefinetely...). Literally every other message is about "do not sell"
130.
by mam2 6y ago
Ehh.. ive thought about it, either for fake news or fake identities. Maybe also people will start spending less time online and care more about local stuff that overall, will impact their lives more directly. Maybe not that bad of a thing.
131.
The shares used to short GME might be counterfied(reddit.com)
4 points by mam2 6y ago|1 comments
132.
by mam2 6y ago
This essentially the same result.. you are making two shorts with one share so one is "naked"....
133.
by mam2 6y ago
oh come one.. if you can't even pay 20 euros for working on defending freedom, why would you expect other people do give their life for it.
134.
by mam2 6y ago
Counterfied shares have already existed. And underreporting in that case cost less money as a fine than what they are losing if the price stays at that price right now. Why do you think i go out all the time during the lockdown ? Because th
135.
by mam2 6y ago
There is too many people trying to build narratives above the randomness of 1M people buying and selling as the wind blows in some random directions. Overall somme will have make money, other will have lost some.. it's a zero sum game
136.
by mam2 6y ago
ok fine but there are other brokers..
137.
by mam2 6y ago
He bet on it 8 month or a year ago. saying, as always, that the financials were good. it's not like wsb picked a stock randomly anyway plus there was the microsoft dea.
138.
by mam2 6y ago
the trollishness. also another hard pill to swallow but most people who voted trump were not "fascist" :roll-eyes:
139.
by mam2 6y ago
Hard to swallow pill: wsb just merely launched a fashion. Other funds rallied to tank Melvin Capital. Retail is still not that influent. The fact that hedge fund follow wsb is.
140.
by mam2 6y ago
Or not.. people have been saying that about tesla for years..
141.
by mam2 6y ago
Well until you have a definite consistent strategy to make money off it, its still "efficient market" with noise. The noise just got bigger...
142.
by mam2 6y ago
so much price. it's not just gme, it's all the thigs shorted by melvin capital: Bed bath and beyond for example. This was particularly helped by literally all the other hedge fund once they realised the short squeeze was going to
143.
by mam2 6y ago
> Many stories like this and people wonder why the general public is less "believing" in science lately. I. Eh im not sure bad studies is the cause. Scientists, especially doctors, wanting to use their authority i some debates
144.
by mam2 6y ago
The best
145.
by mam2 6y ago
You can as early as now if you are all under 35 and not seeing at risk people. The risk of dying is 3x less the one of being hit by a cart. All the rest is pure fear-driven bullshit
146.
by mam2 6y ago
Anyone has an input on how the salt of the water could impact the rockets on reusability ? I've been wondering since they catch the rockets in the ocean
147.
by mam2 6y ago
Haha. well from my own experience there's a percentage of body fat where you actually start some sort of starvation mode where you have 0 energy whatsover. during the evening i used to stare at the wall for like 4 hours before going to
148.
by mam2 6y ago
sure why not
149.
by mam2 6y ago
No but if you take 15% less food for a month and then 30% less in the next month, you will lose weights twice faster... Source: i did the graphs for myself over a few months.. cico works if you calibrate first for a month
150.
by mam2 6y ago
Haha

More ›