Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
malicka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
malicka
8mo ago
I would like to add they waated their time on something evil, not useless . Can’t say I blame them too much for cashing that check, though.
62.
▲
by
malicka
8mo ago
The new CEO’s comments on AI, followed by this… yea, Mozilla’s absolutely captured in the same hype-train as the rest of the industry. Cheers to another few years of woefully incompetent management of the only good browser we have.
63.
▲
by
malicka
10mo ago
That’s exactly the reason the research and development funded by government grants is rarely done in the private sector: It isn’t immediately profitable, and we don’t know for sure if it ever will. It’s important to put man-hours behind eve
64.
▲
by
malicka
11mo ago
> COPYLEFT PROVISION > Any modified versions, derivative works, or software that incorporates any portion of this Software must be released under this same license (HOPL) or a compatible license that maintains equivalent or stronger h
65.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
Unfortunately, sometimes our judges, juries, and officers are also biased or incorrect; pardons are useful when the delivery of justice was mistaken or excessive.
66.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
… that commit is from last week. One week is not at all a sufficient warning, that’s rash and makes them look quite bad. Practically manic.
67.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
No obligation, obviously, no one argues that. The issue is tone. > Clueless software developers should not be messing with kernel settings like irq bindings. Software that does that is not worth my time. Come on, man. If you don’t want t
68.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
> Congratulations on being lucky enough to not be afflicted by a bad enough mental health disorder! All you have to do is to "get out there and do stuff" to achieve fulfillment. It’s true that mentally ill folk (including yours
69.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
I get that permissive licenses are popular now, but “freedom to make sure other people don’t have freedom” still doesn’t feel like a compelling argument. In specific cases, they make sense purely practically; but generally? It feels like a
70.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
Tell me how you know the women you see walking down the street are real women.
71.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
The 24€ one is the official one: > AnkiMobile is the official iOS app and all purchases help fund Anki's development.[1] You could always use the web UI in your phone browser, Ankiweb[2], which is very kindly hosted for free by the
72.
▲
by
malicka
1y ago
Oh this makes me quite happy! I’ve been using an awful hack to do horizontal-mirroring (that sometimes borks), I’m so glad to find there’ll be a better way. Massive props to the author!
73.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
Par for the course with Techrights, unfortunately.
74.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
> Seize all the assets from everyone in the top 10%, and you still won’t have enough to pay for all the labor to service too many old people. We are nowhere near that point; you could perhaps make this argument for Japan (though I’d be
75.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
> Money is a proxy for manpower. It is. But you are talking about a very specific policy: How much money goes into Social Security. The cap is arbitrary – not a calculated reflection of physical reality. It is an artificial restraint! Wh
76.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
> I see no evidence to indicate this. Societies do not exist in a vacuum, they either need to import resources, or they need to defend against invaders. Therefore, the more resources that go to the non productive, the less resources ther
77.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
Luckily, society broadly creates more than enough wealth and resources to provide for you, even when you are disabled or elderly. In modern society, if you are a “sink,” it is solely because the system is designed to make you that way – per
78.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
> The first part is true, the second is not People wanted this because news and social media have told them to want – both which are functionally mouth-pieces of the ultra-wealthy. News has been consolidating into fewer hands for decades
79.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
I’ve used Shapecatcher since laat time it was mentioned on HN, and found it pretty dang useful and surprisingly accurate. Pi’s worked fine for me, among others… did you draw it with multiple strokes, or maybe make the sides too straight?
80.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
This is the patrician way. Tabs for indent, spaces for alignment. Looks the same for everyone, no matter how big or small they want their indents to look!
81.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
This seems quite cute, actually! You’ve got a nice idea here with good execution. I’ll make an account soon, when I have a bit more free time. Not a fan of the AI slop images, and I’d prefer if it were federated, but it’s libre and small en
82.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
> I would even say that the second example has a more masculine voice You could also make the argument that the second is more feminine, as it is non-committal and low-risk, something indicative of “hedging” that women often do.
83.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
While there is a thing to be said about the unethical business practices of Quora/StackOverflow, I reject the framing of “reducing your earning power.” Not everything is about transactions or self-benefit, especially when it comes to k
84.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
With things like this, we trust papers over ourselves because of confirmation bias and the placebo effect. The sugar rush in particular is very culturally prominent, so the seeds of that bias are well-planted in all of us. Arguing against t
85.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
This is a short-term study covering a couple cites in Denmark. Maybe representative, maybe not, and it doesn’t establish long-term trends. I feel this isn’t the right point to take pause about “them”.
86.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
The downside to transparency – someone will bad-faith you into oblivion for telling the truth. Personally, even if the fall-out of losing the servers hasn’t been perfectly-and-neatly handled (civil suit, money back, etc.), I am impressed at
87.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
There is a key difference: When an AI is wrong, it’s “buyer beware; you knew AI isn’t infallible.” You have no recourse. When a human is incompetent, you can blame them or their employer. You have recourse.
88.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
Just to emphasize: When opan says ton, they mean a TON. Around 13 thousand, if I remember correctly.
89.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
It’s not mental illness, it’s the logical extension of principle. If you think non-free software is unjustifiable and should be avoided, you’re probably going to try to avoid using it (or, at least, promoting it). There are three exceptions
90.
▲
by
malicka
2y ago
These sorts of critiques are a red-flag because that is rarely ever the case.
More ›