malcontented

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by malcontented 1y ago

   Agreed, regarding the computational simplicity of CoT LLMs, and that this solution certainly has much more flexibility. But is there a reason to believe that this architecture (and training method) is as applicable to the development of gen
2. 2.▲
   by malcontented 1y ago

   That's a fair argument to make. I should have, perhaps, written "are supposed to be able," or "have become famous for their apparent ability to solve loosely-specified arbitrary problems." CoT _is,_ in my mind at le
3. 3.▲
   by malcontented 1y ago

   I appreciate the connections with neurology, and the paper itself doesn't ring any alarm bells. I don't think I'd reject it if it fell to me to peer review. However, I have extreme skepticism when it comes to the applicabilit