Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mahogany
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mahogany
2y ago
Is this number even known? How would all private revenues be calculated?
62.
▲
by
mahogany
2y ago
> Gain immediate access to a production environment and dump the database I don’t know how easy it is to dump an entire environment, but the “gain access” part depends on the user and what roles they have. If these were highly privileged
63.
▲
by
mahogany
2y ago
You might be misunderstanding (or I am). My reading of the situation currently is that the “real” breaches were due to actual production credentials leaking which were used to actually access production. Then some customers were not using
64.
▲
by
mahogany
2y ago
Don’t they hint at how it happened in what you quoted? > performed with our customers’ user credentials that were exposed through unrelated cyber threat activity Unless they are just making this up, they seem to think that credentials we
65.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
Fun fact, this converges quickly to 1-1/e ~ 0.632. If you had a 1 in a million chance of winning something and you tried a million times, the chance of winning once is about 63.2%, not much different from when n=100.
66.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
It's pretty amusing and it is not the first time I've seen this. Random example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38387168 It's a little scary that it can be so hard to evaluate the correctness of these L
67.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
That is a link to the top 1%. Add the 39.2% from the rest of the top 10%: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBSN09149
68.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
That is impressive! It does look like a textbook question so I wouldn’t be surprised if a formulation almost identical to this is in the training data. But the ability to parse the “mathiness” is still impressive. Higher level math becomes
69.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
I might be projecting just a little bit.
70.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
This thread is going to be similar to threads discussing a paper that points out something negative about alcohol consumption. It’s easy to get defensive (sometimes irrationally so) about our drug habits which may have negative long-term ef
71.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
It would help if you defined “chronic consumer” in this context, because consuming multiple cups of coffee a day certainly sounds chronic to me.
72.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
I think people who are looking for an alternative are not looking for piracy as an answer (many are aware that this is an option). Bandcamp is/was great because you could support the artist directly, with the site taking a modest cut,
73.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
I don't know much Rust, but wouldn't the analogy to (*T, error) be Result<Option<T>, E>, which has 3 states? Or is that not a common construct? Because *T could be nil or non-nil, it seems like the analogy would be a n
74.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
Related: "hauntology" Mark Fisher didn't create this word, but he wrote a lot in the 2000s about our inability to imagine a new future after the failure of our previous visions. Using electronic music - a "future-looking
75.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> What would enterprise look like if Linus was polite and held everybody's hand who wanted to push code into the kernel? Politeness and hand-holding are not the same thing. You can be direct and reject patches while also being polit
76.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> I feel utterly disgusted by the opposite however. The "I like it but I don't love it" and other BS. Well, good thing it's not a dichotomy!
77.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> Can you imagine if there were no consequences for submitting shitty code to the Linux kernel team. Why do there need to be consequences? Can't the maintainers simply ignore shitty code? > You'd have every first year colleg
78.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> 2008 specifically Perhaps the parent comment is talking about pre-Google and you are talking about post-Google? I don’t know if the parent’s claim is correct about a bait and switch, but I can confirm that pre-Google YouTube did not ha
79.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
Try running Docker Desktop, it’ll be gone in no time!
80.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
As to the second half of your comment, you may be interested in this (mammal and bird biomass estimates): https://ourworldindata.org/wild-mammals-birds-biomass
81.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
Well, last time I booked a car last minute (from one of the big ones, I think it was Enterprise), they confirmed my confirmation but didn't have any car available when I showed up the next day. I'd imagine the train is somewhat mo
82.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> Why would this be hell? We aren't in the sky, are we? It's mostly empty there. This attitude is why the planet is polluted and ecosystems are regularly destroyed. I wonder, is something else in the sky? Does the sky have a pu
83.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> It verifies that the track is under tension, but it doesn't attempt to answer if that tension is "too much". Which is what the question asks. I think you (and many others in this thread) are confused because you read the
84.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
That thread is nuts! More than two years of complaints about the installer bricking the OS, followed by crickets from Docker and the thread being automatically closed. Yikes! How can you have a piece of software which you know might complet
85.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
If I can rant for just a moment: I must be getting old because, man I wish that video would just let me... breathe... for one second. Literally: I did not count a single full second of silence in the first two minutes. The editing is senten
86.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
That's fair - but that is assuming indefinite long-term deflation. What about intermittent modest deflation as a tool to bring prices down? It seems that just the idea of deflation is immediately rejected in any conversation about mone
87.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
Is there any evidence that modest deflation actually causes this "holding pattern" in the overall economy? I see this theory stated a lot for the reason that deflation is bad, and it definitely checks out on a basic logical level.
88.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
It's good to keep the facts straight here, which is what you're doing. But it should be noted as well that the broader point being made has not been addressed. Even according to these adjusted figures, the ability to buy Big Macs
89.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> The truth is more like "the rich pay most of the taxes." By itself, this doesn't really mean much; it certainly doesn't address "fairness". For example, even in an inverted regressive tax system, the rich
90.
▲
by
mahogany
3y ago
> I said if there is no satisfaction then you need to find a different job. In this is the implicit assumption that there are enough jobs to give everyone satisfaction - that is what people are taking issue with. Do you believe that assu
More ›