magnusmundus

8 ms·

31.
by magnusmundus 5y ago
...among other sources. "Over four hundred" [1] of them. [1] https://help.duckduckgo.com/results/sources/
32.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
To be fair, customizability and freedom aren't Apple's selling points.
33.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
It really complicates the operations though, which is already proving to be difficult for many countries: You have to add aspirin distribution & storage to the vaccine, which might be an issue for costs if not for the logistics of it. M
34.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
IME BMWs have a rather ambiguous hair-trigger to disengage the speed limiter, unlike some other makes where you would need to push the gas pedal to kickdown (with the obvious tactile bump) for the same. I think that might be skewing GP&#x27
35.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
They weren't doing that in 2019, at least -- and yes, 1/3 sounds (broadly) accurate.
36.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
> the ability to scope things down to what exactly what matters In the last few years, I started shifting my focus from what variety of cases to handle with an elaborate solution, to what possible cases I might be blocking with a simple
37.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
> but this is a sign that as of the poll, there is no consensus agreed. I'm being pedantic on more specific conclusions, but it wasn't the best move. Even if I'm somewhere between "fine" and "happy" abo
38.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
Not the same kind of nesting, is it? [[None for _y in range(y)] for _x in range(x)] for two dimensions is fine, while [None for _x in range(x) for _y in range(y)] (to create a flattened 2-dim list? excuse the dummy example) is
39.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
My point was that you cannot claim "65% of responders opposed this particular proposal". I understand, they're possibly not entirely happy. But the poll is flawed that way: "accept 634" should not mean "reject
40.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
It's consistent with how scoping works in loops and `with` clauses. Agreed that it's more problematic here, though.
41.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
It's mutating (not shadowing) `not_found` with the value of `status`. That can cause trouble if you rely on `not_found` keeping the initial value later somewhere. Which you would, e.g. with the global constant of `NOT_FOUND`. Honestly
42.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
I think your example makes it clearer that it won't be a very subtle a bug to find, but rather completely broken behaviour where only the first case is ever triggered. That should be much simpler to test against. Granted, this breaks d
43.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
It's controversial, granted, but I don't think that's a fair reading of the poll. Here's another: * A majority (56%) of responders want some form of pattern matching. * Exactly half of all responders, forming nearly 90%
44.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
> stop rearranging the chairs and get on with sailing the ship I had never heard this before (though it even has a wiktionary entry), what a beautiful way to put it, thank you. It's really ridiculous, the amount of time we waste on
45.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
Not to detract from your point re competition, but isn't DameJidlo one of the brands of Delivery Hero? Do they have an engineering office in Czechia?
46.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
> why people are fawning over Wolt operating in Berlin mainly the shameful experience of Lieferando, and the several months of total monopoly after their acquisition of the Delivery Hero brands. The antitrust organization really let cust
47.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
Not quite as exciting as your examples, but I guess an evolution of Apple CarPlay might be likely.
48.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
A failed surgery is different to an ineffective vaccination. Surgeries also aren't commonly deployed against epidemics.
49.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
Exactly. Privilege can indeed be earned through hard work (without implying that's the only way to gain/earn it), and one is free to use privilege in life. It's still privilege, and the troublesome part is when that goes unac
50.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
The next sentence states it was banned again after two months. > In November 2010 [...] received an injunction from the court of Sikkim again banning the film.
51.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
> strong walls for me but not for thee Good analogy, especially because governments themselves are living in the same walls (i.e. using the same apps) and this effort will hurt their own security.
52.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
May I ask for the straightforward introduction recommendations in place of GP? I found your comment very interesting -- my understanding of either is still very rough, but as I was reading through Feeling Good[1], I had the feeling that on
53.
by magnusmundus 6y ago
> Woodworking area may only exist in your mind if you're younger than 50 Why is that?
54.
by magnusmundus 7y ago
There's this: https://pint.readthedocs.io/en/0.10.1/
55.
by magnusmundus 7y ago
The actual term is "great replacement", and it's a conspiracy theory regarding an alleged systematic replacement of native Europeans (i.e. "whites"). The Christchurch shooter was a big fan, apparently.
56.
by magnusmundus 7y ago
They would have arrived before the border was sealed. If you think anything short of retroactively applying restrictions is "open borders", we should discuss the colonization of America.
57.
by magnusmundus 9y ago
I actually thought that article limit banner was part of a sarcastic intro. Was not.