madmaniak

10 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   Word exists is useful, the same like the concept of time. I don't take it anywhere no worries. "This kind of argument" you mean "argument"? Arguments applies to everything, agree. This kind of argument applies first
2. 62.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   So the question is, when you broke a vase can you glue it back to the previous state - and the answer is yes. The more exact state you'd like to achieve the more effort it will require. But having the same state again doesn't mean
3. 63.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   Which also implies there's nowhere to travel in this case.
4. 64.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   I'm glad you've bothered to answer. I don't need a fancy proof either - any proof would be enough. What we both can agree is that things or processes are happening. They don't need time for that. Constant change, constan
5. 65.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   Somehow I get down voted for sharing this simple thought. As we participate the same reality you need to admit time travelling is a must have of a pop science magazines. But this sentence makes it all nonsense - as there's no proof for
6. 66.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   Interesting claim about Airbnb or Facebook. Thanks for an answer didn't knew it and I was seriously interested. I always ask to get answers - in good faith for me and others. No idea why you stalk my history and make false assumptions.
7. 67.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   Also it's really weird to ask for citation for a simple implication. Science is based on proofs, not on quotations.
8. 68.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   Citation would be needed for a time proof. I don't know about such.
9. 69.▲
   by madmaniak 8y ago

   Time doesn't exist therefore you can't travel in it.
10. 70.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    Never got the answer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18978404
11. 71.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    ES5 > ES6+
12. 72.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    It's Microsoft paid. Before you had React - FB paid and before Angular - Google paid. For example Angular 1 was also promoted like - it's made by Google, so it makes sense. It didn't - Angular 2 is incompatible with 1 and rej
13. 73.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    You stop doing really simple errors if you allow yourself to train in this direction. Really simple errors are really easy to fix. After all boilerplate and effort you make in this kind of typed languages is not worth it. I'm not sayin
14. 74.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    Sorry for being so pessimistic. I wish it be other way. I keep my fingers crossed for your project.
15. 75.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    I understood you correctly. I'm just saying, even if you will build remarkable product you will loose with some corporation technology like TypeScript. They don't need to be remarkable.
16. 76.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    What is remarkable project in TypeScript? It's just Microsoft money and brainwashing on conferences and in articles. It doesn't work reasonable way. I wish you good luck though.
17. 77.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    I was programming all these languages and 20y I do web technologies. Dynamic typed languages with a neat syntax was a huge step forward, developer became powerful with a single line of code. The biggest discovery was - you need all that too
18. 78.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    I'm just promoting the question, so I will have some answer.
19. 79.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18978404 None so far...
20. 80.▲
    Ask HN: What is an example of big TypeScript application?

    1 points by madmaniak 8y ago|0 comments
21. 81.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    You're not missing anything and you will not receive any reasonable explanation for using TS. It's a step back 20y in programming. Easy to recognise when you were programming 20y ago also.
22. 82.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    Article doesn't loads for me. Whatever is said, the answer is simple. REST was meant to be used by other applications in a not yet known way, and many where claiming REST is a "best practice" for API of YOUR single page appli
23. 83.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    Stop Amazon propaganda. Serverless is when there is no server, for example only clients communicating P2p.
24. 84.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    So in order to mutate DOM and present mutable state, you think you need to introduce immutability in the middle? Someone mislead you.
25. 85.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    It's great you've noticed immutability in a singled threaded environment is a nonsense. Why to go further with own implementation then?
26. 86.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    Wow! Such a lot of work on top of a mistake which they already figured out, too bad that only in a scale of laboratory room. If EVERYTHING is determined taking quasars from far far away (in time and space) doesn't change anything in th
27. 87.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    SPA done properly is much simpler than classical, well known and established ways of making web applications. The only issue is in misleading "best practices".
28. 88.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    If the key is attached in link it also should be passed secure way, which is not usually.
29. 89.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    I could but such comments are getting flagged.
30. 90.▲
    by madmaniak 8y ago

    The shortest implementation of solving algorithm is a stack of taken moves while shuffling which just should be reversed one by one.