3 ms·
Which also implies there's nowhere to travel in this case.
by madmaniak 8y ago
Which also implies there's nowhere to travel in this case.
- coldtea 8y agoNot really. A reconfiguration of the matter on the world on the same state would still be exactly equivalent to a travel back in time (to that "now") in that case. And such a time travel might not even take active agency to happen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_recurrence_theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_recurrence_theor...
- madmaniak 8y agoIt would be an equivalent but not travelling in time itself. If I will go by car to point B I can't say I was travelling by train just because of the same result. Occurring the same state is obvious on condition of finite amount of state and infinite amount of mutations. The question is if amount of states are finite.