madhouse

30 ms·

241.
by madhouse 16y ago
Why would it be more unlikely, than the religious women sleeping with an atheist? (If I may add, both scenarios are fairly common even now, and we're not even facing extinction yet)
242.
by madhouse 16y ago
How about the option that the atheists turn to religion? That would be a far more likely option in the given situation. If it comes to rape being the only option, it'd probably better for humanity to die out. However, I do agree that this q
243.
by madhouse 16y ago
I'd say, whichever you're most comfortable with, but it also depends a lot on your startup. Apache is a good general purpose web server, the others are a bit more specialized. Personally, I use nginx, because I do not need the extra stuff a
244.
by madhouse 16y ago
Depends on what I get stuck on, and how bad it is. Taking a break to clear one's head can help a lot. I also found that postponing the problem, and doing something completely unrelated allows my subconciousness to dream up an idea. If the s
245.
by madhouse 16y ago
While I understand the frustration that gave birth to this rant, I would like to note that all this has nothing to do with squid per-se. First of all, squid has nothing to do with ssh, irc or smtp - that's one's firewall, not the proxy. As
246.
by madhouse 16y ago
I do want to work offline, so, no, haven't tried, didn't even consider. What advantage would having the whole home up on evernote/dropbox/whatever over having only select parts of it there?
247.
by madhouse 16y ago
I put these files in revision control aswell. But in case I wouldn't be able to, I'd postfix it with a timestamp: product-demo-20100922-1050.ppt If that's too verbose, then product-demo-20100922-N.ppt, where N is an arbitrary, but increasin
248.
by madhouse 16y ago
I'm a big fan of full disclosure - I'd do that. I would advise against selling your findings, in the long run, that would only make facebook worse than it already is. So, either full disclosure, or tell facebook and give them a few days, I'
249.
by madhouse 16y ago
I don't have much experience with PHP or anything related, but when I was in similar shoes (coming from perl, though), I tried Django, and it was very very easy. From basically zero Django knowledge, and only very little python, I had a usa
250.
by madhouse 16y ago
I'm learning Haskell, because I've heard good things about it, and it sounds like fun. I already know most of the better known languages, at least on a read level, so I figured I'll learn something else, for fun.
251.
by madhouse 16y ago
I have used such software - though, it didn't affect me, since I wasn't on neither macos nor windows. As long as it's a request, and not an additional restriction on the GPL license, it's legal. Since it's free software, one can hack it out
252.
by madhouse 16y ago
Yes, I would. Thinking out loud helps a lot in my experience - and that's what most people perceive as "talking to himself".
253.
by madhouse 16y ago
adblock, autopager, pendule, tabjump, window resizer & delicious
254.
by madhouse 16y ago
http://github.com/jbalogh/zamboni would probably be a good start, and http://pinaxproject.com/ another.
255.
by madhouse 16y ago
I found it hilarious how they outruled everything but Java on slide 6, without any proof why the others would be inferior. I also found it quite funny how the slides dissed Javascript just a few pages later, only to come back to it a few pa
256.
by madhouse 16y ago
Been using it myself since... around 0.2 or so, very satisfied. The upgrades were painless too, which was a nice surprise - I expected a few hickups during the earlier releases, but found none.
257.
Comparision of Zope's object DB with Django's ORM(blog.mozilla.com)
5 points by madhouse 16y ago|0 comments
258.
by madhouse 16y ago
I would definitely go with rails 3.0. Most of the plugins you will want for a new project, while being new to rails, will be available in rails 3.0. There's quite a few of good stuff in 3.0 that makes it a lot easier for new people to get s
259.
by madhouse 16y ago
I think I was quite clear that there is a sarcasm, but oh well. I responded to a vague comment which asserted that Django is "years behind", without any substantial proof, apart from "it lacks quality and maturity". Compared to that, I gave
260.
by madhouse 16y ago
At night, at home, in my bed, in my sleep.
261.
by madhouse 16y ago
Yes, ActiveRecord is a joy to use, while Django's ORM is years behind. Right. No.
262.
by madhouse 16y ago
Using Chrome 7: Pressing right on the last page restarts the animation (and a vertical scrollbar is visible for a very short time). Using Firefox 3.6: There's a horizontal scrollbar on multiple pages (some stay even after animation ends, so
263.
by madhouse 16y ago
Thunderbird would be a good choice. Mozilla has a few calendar solutions aswell: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ (haven't used them, I'm happy with google calendar's web interface).
264.
by madhouse 16y ago
You can post binary via Twitter, yes.
265.
by madhouse 16y ago
Depends. Can I gzip it?
266.
by madhouse 16y ago
Well, I don't think a GUI is more complex than editing nearly the same stuff in a text editor. But that might be just me. However, if you want to go down to bare-bones stuff, give a try to http://ikiwiki.info/ . Quite a few solutions exist
267.
Native ZFS is coming to Linux next month(phoronix.com)
4 points by madhouse 16y ago|0 comments
268.
by madhouse 16y ago
What advantage would your system have over any of the existing CMS systems? There's a dozen of good, well-established CMS systems out there (CMS made simple, Drupal, e107, Joomla!, Typo, Plone, and so on and so forth)...
269.
by madhouse 16y ago
I'd try C# - it isn't all that complicated.
270.
by madhouse 16y ago
A dBase III option would be neat. They're still using that in certain places....

More ›