madhatter999

4 ms·

1.
by madhatter999 15d ago
Publicly…
2.
by madhatter999 1mo ago
Like you foresaw, I'll say this is the reality for most people. I think that just like now, those who want to do meaningful work will seek opportunities to do so. If we had something like a Maslow’s hierarchy of needs but for work, I t
3.
by madhatter999 1mo ago
I think you're assuming work's only function is getting things done. Work also is a crowd control tool.
4.
by madhatter999 1mo ago
If that's what Occam's razor would suggest, then Occam presumes a world where actors do what they say. We see more and more the opposite of that in Silicon Valley. You may well be right about Google not including the said data but
5.
by madhatter999 1mo ago
Given it's Google, I don't believe it.
6.
by madhatter999 1mo ago
Makes sense when you consider what type of data Google had available in abundance. Natural written language (e.g., Docs, Gmail, Books) and natural spoken language (e.g., YouTube). One could argue that Google Colab would supply the training
7.
by madhatter999 3mo ago
I agree. The Fable fiasco was the first yikes moment in my relationship with Anthropic and based on what I'm reading, this is valid for many others. Sonnet 5 isn't helping their case as well.
8.
by madhatter999 3mo ago
To add to this, one can’t ignore the relationship between signal and receiver. I’d imagine most people on HN have enough pre-LLM reading experience to have a decent sense of what was written by an LLM versus a human. And as LLMs get better
9.
by madhatter999 3mo ago
Plus somebody will create an AI-powered program to take in text and have it “perform” the writing process with keystrokes and mouse movements and all that.
10.
by madhatter999 2y ago
It’s kind of confusing but the comparison is not with input photos to the left, it is with reference photos to the right
11.
by madhatter999 2y ago
Thanks for the clarification. I did look at it pretty quickly initially. Students might be over-relying on GPTs, which means less studying, which means less useful retention in the exam
12.
by madhatter999 2y ago
Relying on GPT while solving the problems must be inflating the grades (my use of the word inflate is intentional, because the evaluation does not represent the true knowledge of the student), which then results in lower retention in the lo
13.
by madhatter999 2y ago
From the abstract: “Consistent with prior work, our results show that access to GPT-4 significantly improves performance (48% improvement for GPT Base and 127% for GPT Tutor). However, we additionally find that when access is subsequently t
14.
by madhatter999 2y ago
Also take into consideration the speed of evolution. LLM training might be much faster because a lot of competition power is used for its training. Maybe if it was the same speed as evolution then it would take billions of years, too?
15.
by madhatter999 2y ago
This[0] study might have some pointers in the discussion section. [0] Grateful students are motivated, engaged, and successful in school: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental evidence, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#
16.
by madhatter999 2y ago
I didn't know notebooklm had that feature embedded. Thanks for sharing!
17.
by madhatter999 2y ago
Thank you for the pointer! What makes LlamaIndex different than other similar tools in your opinion?
18.
by madhatter999 2y ago
Thank you for the answer! Wouldn't it make sense to compare the potential answers to the questions to the parts of the documents?
19.
Ask HN: Way to extract relevant parts from a PDF based on a question?
1 points by madhatter999 2y ago|8 comments
20.
by madhatter999 2y ago
Very promising tool based on a couple of questions I asked it! How did the cleaning of documents look like?
21.
by madhatter999 3y ago
Absurdity aside, I set a reminder for any trial end, preferably a couple of days before.
22.
by madhatter999 3y ago
Upward doesn’t have to be linear
23.
by madhatter999 3y ago
A minute? It’s eternity in my thumb managed universe.
24.
by madhatter999 3y ago
Now if you were drunk while playing Need for Speed, that wouldn’t be a problem because there is no “real” humans being endangered by your actions.