madcadmium

5 ms·

1.
by madcadmium 1y ago
> by all metrics, immigrants are a net positive to society. What about wage suppression?
2.
by madcadmium 2y ago
"Someday, the sky will fall" Ok.
3.
by madcadmium 2y ago
> This would provide an incredibly precise estimate of the user's location. Within ~250 miles of their location is not "incredibly precise"
4.
by madcadmium 2y ago
I would like to read this article but am unwilling to provide even a fake e-mail address to do so
5.
by madcadmium 2y ago
I wonder how many of their telecom devices like routers, switches, etc. have bombs implanted in their power supplies
6.
by madcadmium 2y ago
I wonder how many of their telecom devices like routers, switches, etc. have bombs implanted in their power supplies
7.
by madcadmium 2y ago
His wealthy parents, probably
8.
by madcadmium 2y ago
Does it also monitor the contents of your copy/paste buffer? It would scoop up a ton of privileged data if so.
9.
by madcadmium 2y ago
> Operations and Sysadmins I don't forsee ever changing, especially with AI. Why not?
10.
by madcadmium 2y ago
Yes, the woman who started Ark Invest because it was "God's will"
11.
by madcadmium 2y ago
When I managed a large fleet of EC2 instances running CentOS I had Ansible running locally on each machine via a cron job. I only used remote SSH to orchestrate deployments (stop service, upgrade, test, put back in service).
12.
by madcadmium 2y ago
How much leverage though?
13.
by madcadmium 2y ago
Yeah, I was really confused. This guy loves his BMW M3 but wants to ditch it for a Tesla?
14.
by madcadmium 3y ago
It's in the article: > Ken didn’t know it when all this was happening (and it’s not at all obvious from the Apple prompts), but clicking “Allow” would not have allowed the attackers to change Ken’s password. Rather, clicking “Allow”
15.
by madcadmium 3y ago
Oh, the irony!
16.
by madcadmium 3y ago
You can control what messages you receive by closing your client
17.
by madcadmium 3y ago
The remaining employee's workloads are about to increase 50%
18.
by madcadmium 3y ago
Because people who don't bother to read the article assume it's a new breach, as we can see in the comments here ("another breach"). I'm not saying that it makes it better or worse.
19.
by madcadmium 3y ago
This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.
20.
by madcadmium 3y ago
This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.
21.
by madcadmium 3y ago
This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.
22.
by madcadmium 3y ago
That's rich coming from IBM
23.
by madcadmium 3y ago
This is karma for their passive-aggressive blog post about Okta's security incident one week earlier
24.
by madcadmium 3y ago
Isn't Equifax part of a de facto monopoly? Okta doesn't have that luxury. Security is also not Equifax's core competency, but it is supposed to be Okta's. I would be happy for you to be right, but I think this happening
25.
by madcadmium 3y ago
Okta outsources their support staff to save millions of dollars while losing billions of dollars in market cap each time their support staff gets hacked.
26.
by madcadmium 4y ago
Competitive advantage?
27.
by madcadmium 4y ago
Locking down what, exactly?
28.
by madcadmium 4y ago
That would be contrary to Okta's zero-trust security model.
29.
by madcadmium 4y ago
Okta employee here. I can assure you that there are no clear-text credentials in our source code.
30.
by madcadmium 4y ago
You're saying that we've reached peak automation?

More ›