mad_fab

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mad_fab 13y ago

   1. The server and the client must be MPTCP-"aware", so the anwser is yes (but look, someone is talking about a proxy up there, it's a solution to avoid this problem). 2. I'm in the team working in the Linux Kernel implementation and yes thi
2. 2.▲
   by mad_fab 13y ago

   In short: hard to deploy because of middleboxes dropping all non-TCP/UDP traffic..
3. 3.▲
   by mad_fab 13y ago

   The main advantage is: the congestion control! With MPTCP you could deal with congestion at the transport level. Meaning, if you have three flow MPTCP will select the best (less RTT, space in the win, etc..) link to send datas, where the b
4. 4.▲
   by mad_fab 13y ago

   Yes, a proxy solution is definitely a way to go, but to help the deployment only. In the end we shouldn't need those.
5. 5.▲
   by mad_fab 13y ago

   If you want to try it; it's easy http://multipath-tcp.org/pmwiki.php?n=Users.HowToInstallMPTC... Also, we have a measurements campaign running, if you want to contribute ;) http://multipath-tcp.org/pmwiki.php?n=Users.AboutMeasures