Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mach1ne
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
To me it seems more likely that actors with robust systems are enough
92.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Luckily it currently seems that AI will be federated. No actor has a proper moat for even short-term competition to catch up.
93.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
This has been possible for quite a few years now, and the world hasn’t exploded so far.
94.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Depending on definition, it is solved.
95.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
> It also isn't generating "the most likely response" - that's what original GPT-3 did, GPT-3.5 and up don't work that way. What changed?
96.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
> what if we pair GPT-4 with an actual reasoning engine? What do we get then? At best, decreased error rate in logic puzzles and questions.
97.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Ah. My bad, thank you for clearing that up. This also nullifies the usage of this type of datapoint in supporting the hypothesis I mentioned above.
98.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
It is not. "Comparing brain volume before and after individuals were exposed to SARS-CoV-2, this study documents significant cortical gray matter loss, equivalent to nearly 10 years of aging." [1]
99.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
An unlikely but sadly possible explanation is COVID itself. We know even mild cases cause loss of brain mass.[1] There are no studies (to my knowledge) in whether sequential infections cause this loss every time, and whether the brain mass
100.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Im skeptical of their dedication towards trying to advance humanity versus more mundane objectives. It's a tale as old as time that noble initial goals are corrupted by power and greed when opportunity presents itself.
101.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Not ChatGPT, but LLaMa. Not as good as ChatGPT, but seeing the pace of progress when performance has been demonstrated, we'll have ChatGPT running on our laptops by summer. End of the year at the latest.
102.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
How did this not get traction? I came upon the model from Twitter by chance. This is the first seemingly valid and functional open-source ChatGPT alternative. Can’t wait for the optimizations which will allow it (or similar) to run on consu
103.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
It depends on what you expect of ChatGPT. A reliable human-like assistant? No. A reliable natural-language API to every IoT capable device? Absolutely.
104.
▲
Have We Crossed the Event Horizon?
(exlibris.fyi)
1 points
by
mach1ne
4y ago
|
0 comments
105.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Way too unclear. Game flow isn’t explained before the game, you’re just thrown in with no idea what to do beyond the example prompts. Introduction to mechanics before a game would improve the experience.
106.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
I wonder if we may have crossed the threshold into singularity. LLMs will almost inevitably be on pretty much everything in 5 years. Looking at how well current GPTs are able to write calls to external APIs, their integration to systems wil
107.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
If interested in live deep sea hydrophone stream, this[1] is a great place. You can hear whales and other creatures most of the time. Also sometimes the crazy noise ships make even deep to the abyss. [1] https://www.mbari.org
108.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Depending on the projected costs and other risks, yes, that could happen.
109.
▲
Figure emerges from stealth with the first images of its humanoid robot
(techcrunch.com)
2 points
by
mach1ne
4y ago
|
0 comments
110.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Not very effective considering that it will be remade in open source 1-2 years from now.
111.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
Doubt. Superintelligence is one thing, but AI as workers is limited to the cost of human workers. Exceedingly unlikely that the cost will stay there and not come down.
112.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
And after the Machine Wars we will have the Buthlerian Jihad, forbidding computers once and for all.
113.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
>Near term relatively low Precisely. Above 1% so in the realm of possible, but definitely not above 50% and probably not above 5% in the next 10-15 years. My guesstimate is around 1-2%. But expand the time horizon to the next 50 years an
114.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
The commonly held belief currently seems to be that you can't beat the markets. I've found this too narrow-minded. True, you can hardly beat the markets in their own game, but you can find a game where you're the one with the
115.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
One of the greatest achievements of the scientific method was to move research further away from the impreciseness and fallacies embedded in language.
116.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
The difference between LLM cognition and human cognition probably lies somewhere in this dichotomy.
117.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
I think they're also targeting the very wrong audience. Metaverse feels like a weird incarnation of Microsoft Teams - from corporate, to corporate. It's really not for young people. One has difficulty finding examples from history
118.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
I expect we will see a capitalist generative dystopia of some 1-2 decades before regulation hopefully steps in.
119.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
How does one use it? No obvious link to any chatroom
120.
▲
by
mach1ne
4y ago
It's wild looking back at how revolutionary the unicorn story GPT-2 wrote was only a few short years ago. And now we're at ChatGPT.
More ›