maaanu

5 ms·

1.
by maaanu 3y ago
Yes, I've observed the same phenomenon. The more detailed my prompts are, the more errors GPT tends to make. I use it as a partner to discuss implementation ideas, before I start coding. That works very well, because gpt and I usually
2.
by maaanu 3y ago
The market share of the iphone is about 20%. So I think your comparison falls short with the very first item. I am okay, to be totally vendor locked in the apple-ecosystem, because Androids market share is so much higher. If the iPhone fail
3.
by maaanu 3y ago
You are seriously telling me that humans predicting word for word when they speak?
4.
by maaanu 3y ago
I mean since apollo users are a subset of reddit user your comparison seem pretty mundane.
5.
by maaanu 3y ago
Do you have proof that all the uproar is caused by young people? Because I do not think that reddits user base is young compared to ig or tiktok.
6.
by maaanu 3y ago
a and b are basically the same point, since they both can be abstract to the point "make revenue". I used Apollo because it provides a much better user experience and it is not even close to Reddits own App.
7.
by maaanu 3y ago
For all we know, these are the most popular names in OPs county.
8.
by maaanu 3y ago
That´s good for you and I could give you some anecdotes with ChatGPT, were it failed horribly, e.g. were it failed to generate unit-tests for a simple api-call (about 10 loc)... I am sure the tools will only improve, but I don't unders
9.
by maaanu 3y ago
Currently the AI is not even able to improve my work... How should it replace me? I think the statement "AI is finally at the place where it can replace brain-power for many tasks" is ridiculous.
10.
by maaanu 3y ago
That is a bold claim.
11.
by maaanu 3y ago
I see this claim so often and I fail to understand it every time... What kind of junior devs do you hire, where this is the case? And what kind of tasks do you give them?
12.
by maaanu 4y ago
Really? For me it could not generate meaning full tests, even for the simplest react-components. E.g. it tried to test the display of an error-message in a field in a form. The error message was basically "this is field is required and
13.
by maaanu 4y ago
I don't know... Einstein had a lot of love affairs and debated about philosophy with some friends and was very politically active (e.g. he wrote pro-socialism articles for newspapers). In the context of theoretical physics all of this
14.
by maaanu 4y ago
That argument is easily reverseable - if there are more programmers who can write decent apps for chromium & firefox maybe Safari is not just as good as its competitors on a different platform?
15.
by maaanu 4y ago
If you think that your description is teaching, you never had a teacher or only very lousy ones.
16.
by maaanu 5y ago
That only holds true if the market is purely rational which it is not.
17.
by maaanu 5y ago
One can make any statement and if the "opposition" wants to see some proof you just deflect it and require them to bring proof that your statement is incorrect? That sounds incredible one-sided.
18.
by maaanu 5y ago
Exact the same analogy Dan Abramov used in his blog: https://overreacted.io/npm-audit-broken-by-design/
19.
by maaanu 5y ago
True, but it is a decent argument against "it is just your personal preference".
20.
by maaanu 6y ago
I think others think differently https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/docs/
21.
by maaanu 6y ago
But I literally can email somebody from email-provider a to email-provider b. But, lets be realistic, if the email would be discovered/invented today, that would not be the case ;-)
22.
by maaanu 6y ago
Yes, the government is responsible because it violates basic human rights. At least in germany this kind of behavior is forbidden.
23.
by maaanu 7y ago
Sorry, I don't think that is true at all. For one developer there are 5 Job offers. I know multiple people who wrote 14 applications and got 14 offers. Others did not even bother to write any because they got so much offers from headhu
24.
by maaanu 8y ago
I had a super simple rule-based, which had about 80% win rate against a 'Insane AI' (depending on the starting position..) - 50% is so not impressive.