m-p-3

24 ms·

331.
by m-p-3 3y ago
It may not be "illegal" to buy positive reviews, but it definitely undermine the trustworthiness of their whole brand if they do. I'll definitely stay clear of their product for the near future if they undervalue their produc
332.
by m-p-3 3y ago
As long as it isn't too recent, considering how difficult it might be to find the drivers that works for WinXP/32-bit.
333.
by m-p-3 3y ago
which makes this works in the browser https://mlc.ai/web-llm/#chat-demo
334.
by m-p-3 3y ago
you can apply filter on Mastodon, not only on tags but on words themselves. simply filter "Musk" to have a Musk-free Mastodon experience.
335.
by m-p-3 3y ago
> So a mistriggered security or regulatory function could cut off access to the account, followed by being cut off from your bank or other accounts wrapped up on that same passkey store? In terms of key, it's either stored at the OS
336.
by m-p-3 3y ago
Fair enough, all these systems were implemented at different times for different reason, while achieving a similar goal. Unifying them behind a single system is a good thing. I'm happy to know that my tasks and reminders generated from
337.
by m-p-3 3y ago
They're trying to expand towards some privacy-focused offering. I enjoy having Firefox Relay to hide my real email address when subscribing on a website. I hope they'll keep increading their paid services to become sustainable.
338.
by m-p-3 3y ago
and the Passkeys requires to be secured by a PIN or biometric. So Passkey = Something you have, PIN = Something you know.
339.
by m-p-3 3y ago
I don't think it's a big issue, as there are bigger markets out there than the US. Android is quite popular in Europe and Asia. I live in Canada and I personally find iOS undesirable because of how locked down it is, so I don&#x27
340.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I reached out to mine, not covered :(
341.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Is there any development on Tesseract, or at least on updating the trained models out there? Just curious.
342.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I use that to sync savestates between RetroArch on mobile, desktop and laptop. no need to worry and I can resume my games wherever I am.
343.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I'm surprised they didn't offer some subscription-based extra features to have a steady flow of revenue instead of only depending on hardware sale.
344.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I live in a country where it's sub-zero almost 4 months in the year. being able to control the watch with physical buttons without taking of my gloves is underrated. I enjoy my BangleJS2, but the tactile display feels like a downgrade
345.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Is there any demonstrated case where someone was able to exfiltrate secrets from a Yubikey secure element?
346.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Personally if I want a "newsletter" I'll look for an RSS feed to depolute my email inbox. Sadly they're not really fashionable there days :( At least I can subscribe and unsubscribe at my convenience without requiring th
347.
by m-p-3 4y ago
The "something you have" shouldn't be easily replicated. If someone could capture your SSH key passphrase and copy the ssh private key then it's not an actual 2FA. a device like a Yubikey won't let you extract the s
348.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Technically you would be distributing your own implementation, not the original source code. Copyright does allow you to do that. They just applied the concept of reproducible build on top.
349.
by m-p-3 4y ago
But they're not distributing the compiled output, only their own implementation of the source code which leads to that. If they happen to make their own source code which leads to the same assembly opcodes in the compiler, is that real
350.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Copyright, specifically code will only let you protect the IMPLEMENTATION, the code the copyright owner specifically made, not the IDEA of the code. > Good luck trying to prove to any judge in the world that you came up with an implement
351.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Since Microsoft's implementation of FIDO2 is passwordless, you NEED to use a PIN, which is the "something you know" part, the key being "something you have". And if the PIN is complex enough, bruteforcing or guessin
352.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Copyright laws mostly covers the assets (images, texts, etc) and the actual implementation. If you happen to make your own implementation that leads to the same output when compiled, that would be considered fair use in most situations. As
353.
by m-p-3 4y ago
You can still achieve that without having access to the original source code, so the implementation would be considered clean from copyright claims as long as it doesn't contain any copyrighted assets (which are necessary to achieve a
354.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I'm currently looking into deploying hardware keys for some of our users at work (mostly through Microsoft SSO which is FIDO2 passwordless), and one of the roadblock on our end is the inability to define our own minimum requirements fo
355.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Which you can absolutely not base yourself if you want to ensure it's considered a clean-room reverse engineering and not have Nintendo's armies of lawyers sweeping down on you.
356.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I own a BangleJS2. I don't use the fitness features but it works quite well on Android with GadgetBridge, a pricacy-focused smartwatch management app, and the OS and apps are all open-source. It was a bit rough around the edge when it
357.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I can't imagine the amount of stress and danger these informants and infiltrators are going through.
358.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I'd actually prefer if marketing stuck to the facts. Sugarcoating too much doesn't help the consumers.
359.
by m-p-3 4y ago
I don't think Apple will diminish their control on the App Store requirement, it's too much of a selling point to them. In fact I hope they keep their requirements the same, and I'm quite happy to see sideloading becoming a t
360.
by m-p-3 4y ago
Like how I want a dumb TV with the system of my choice hooked up behind it. You can't trust the TV manufacturer to keep the OS up-to-date, and with TV prices always going down it's inevitable they'll cut corners to increase t

More ›