lwhi

172 ms·

1921.
by lwhi 17y ago
I don't think I've ever heard a joke about Apple cars.
1922.
by lwhi 17y ago
If you try to genuinely fool someone after noon on 1st of April, you are the fool. The 'April Fool' label prevents that heinous possibility from occurring.
1923.
by lwhi 17y ago
HTML5 isn't an official standard yet. Will Apple end up defining what becomes part of the specification due to early (premature) adoption?
1924.
by lwhi 17y ago
Come on - lighten up. It's an article which lampoons the behaviour of Apple. Apple are engaging in protectionist behaviour - the development of iHTML would be the extreme conclusion of this trend. It's relevant today, because their recent
1925.
by lwhi 17y ago
I think there should be grounds for anticompetitive behaviour. Whether I bought my iPhone outright, or whether I'm tied into a contract for 18-24 months, there isn't a sense of competition because I have no reasonable alternative to purchas
1926.
by lwhi 17y ago
I think this is a game of 'what if'. If providing tools to manage privacy gave MS an advantage, I could imagine there's at least a possibility they might supply them.
1927.
by lwhi 17y ago
It's not just about quality. As with everything Apple does - there are company-centric motives, which have been neatly balanced against a set of consumer-centric motives. Apple is run by smart people, who realise they have a dedicated follo
1928.
by lwhi 17y ago
I think graphic design should be thought of as graphical engineering .. in the sense that a good graphic designer is always trying to find the very best way to approach a problem. Poor design isn't down to having bad aesthetic taste or lack
1929.
by lwhi 17y ago
If it looks like time has been spent on attention-to-detail - and the application's approach has been thought out well, there's a fair chance visitors will view the app as a quality product regardless of graphical finesse. Maybe the best ap