Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lwhi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
92 ms
·
961.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
> Why should they change the way they develop games for 0.1% of their sales? Your last paragraph provides the most important reason. By changing the way they develop, they will increase their customer base.
962.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
In my opinion it's probably worth discussing. I'm generally concerned if someone tells me not to worry.
963.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
This company described the service as 'revenue sharing' .. http://www.callagenix.com/numbers/090x-premium-rate-numbers
964.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
It unfortunately isn't!
965.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Sure, send me a mail and I'll do my best.
966.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
I told my phone company, they wouldn't refund. I also reported the number to the communications ombudsman .. haven't heard anything since unfortunately.
967.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
A local taxi company near me was relisted on Google maps using a pay-per-minute redirect service. The scammers get paid, and the customer is non the wiser until they get their bill. I was charged about £5 for a 30 second call.
968.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
I think you're greatly underestimating the danger involved.
969.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
If the modifications a person makes have the potential to kill members of the public, I think you're wrong. This is new technology; laws and regulations need to reach a stage where they're able to protect against the worst from ha
970.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Yeah, good point - may have been watching too much TV :)
971.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
I definitely understand your point, but I'm talking about the specific context the acronym is being used in. e.g. callsPoiAtHome() callsPoiAtHomeAtGeoPoint() callsPoiAtFamiliarPlace() callsPoiAtWorkPlace() Edit: typo
972.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Groups of people travelling together?
973.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Good point .. but if you look at the context, I think person of interest actually makes more sense in a lot of cases.
974.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
I'm guessing POI stands for person of interest? If so, seems more nefarious to me ... Edit: definitely more likely it's point of interest
975.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Hmmmmm.
976.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Intelligent choices will lead to success. Including creating roles that make sense. As an employer .. if something can be automated, and you're paying someone to do it manually—do you deserve to get burnt?
977.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Exactly - as a permanent employee, are you being paid for time or value?
978.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
When most people or organisations are purchasing a service, they're usually mainly concerned about the value that service will bring them. The amount of effort required to produce that value, helps to dictate market conditions and the
979.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
One step closer to a Handmaid's Tale. Blessed be the fruit ..
980.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
I think Google's behaviour probably has something to do with it too.
981.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
The means might not justify the need. e.g. Psychological support could be via a webchat platform.
982.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
I do think Google has turned a corner recently. They've achieved so much ubiquity, that their offerings are becoming incompatible with an open web.
983.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
They could offer support. Counselling comes to mind .. in the form of a regular debrief or supervision session
984.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Clients vs. livestock maybe ..
985.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
If an organisation gets to a certain size, is it inevitable that it will eventually turn bad and disregard it's end-users' interests? Is this just the nature of the beast?
986.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
No it isn't. The current system isn't working for enough people.
987.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Yes. Regulation should ensure a fair and level playing field for all. It's not anti-capitalist, it just stops the big guys from ruining things for everyone else.
988.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
No it isn't. Limits placed on capitalism, through regulation, might be an example of letting society (the system) sort itself out. If limits aren't introduced, the gap between rich and poor becomes too vast. It become futile for t
989.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
Unrestricted capitalism will never be a force for good. Left running without any regulation, the gap between rich and poor will increase adinfinitum. This kind of philanthropy acts as a last ditch attempt to correct the negative affects th
990.
▲
by
lwhi
8y ago
I find it ironic the site has a big cookie modal you need to accept before reading anything.
More ›