lwansbrough

8 ms·

91.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
Yes. There’s no other explanation for 14x, that’s nuts.
92.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
I had an idea that devs could build wasm modules that would define tools and instructions, and a harness could load them. Kind of like MCP but with certain assurances about the sandboxing. You could build a package manager around these beha
93.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
I was able to pull up an example of a Chinese model doing censorship in 2 seconds. So there is clearly a difference in the type of censorship happening if it’s harder than that for you to prove. Your example is already under dispute by actu
94.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
This image really helped me put it into perspective. https://x.com/AndyMasley/status/2032858292184117748
95.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
Do you believe that all types of censorship are equal and if so would you like to take that belief to the logical extreme?
96.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
Please point to an example where the information (or more importantly its practical application) is both censored but is also not legitimately harmful and/or illegal.
97.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
Do you have any actual examples of political history being actively censored by western models? Or are we just doing hypotheticals for fun?
98.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
Ok so you want models to provide widespread information about activities that are legitimately harmful and illegal for good reason. And that’s the same as censoring a country’s violent history to you guys? How intellectually dishonest.
99.
by lwansbrough 5mo ago
Are you disputing that Chinese models censor content at the request of the government? https://i.imgur.com/cVtLuj1.jpeg The absence of information is also Xi Jinping Thought.
100.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
Apparently!
101.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
What’s Trump got to do with this? If you invest anything in the Canadian market you probably hold some Brookfield. Carney’s investments are in a blind trust. What more could be done, in your view?
102.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
I guess we shouldn’t do anything because Brookfield exists.
103.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
You might be, but cycling adoption is strongly linked to safer riding conditions. Protected bike lanes are demonstrably safer. So perhaps you should be more concerned about people blocking roadways with their garbage?
104.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
0.1nm please. It's x-ray lithography time!
105.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
TASTWDYCPI: Trump always seeks the worst deal you can possibly imagine
106.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
I think I’d prefer AI slop comments to comments like this.
107.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
That can’t be aero. On a serious note there’s a marketing problem in my view: who out there who chooses to buy a bell even considers that their might be a loudness problem? It’s not immediately obvious that I need this and I’m sure there’s
108.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
That is what it means. Unless you're losing an argument on the internet and you need a word to hide behind. ;)
109.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
I won’t be taking responsibility for the scrapers that are molesting the free and open web and destroying its economic viability. Somebody else is doing that.
110.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
1 step at a time until the Americans wake the fuck up
111.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
May need triple redundancy for MS Outlook for the next mission.
112.
by lwansbrough 6mo ago
Could probably extrapolate positions based on heading and speed, to do some fake "real time" positions.
113.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
I think generally people regard a harness as the system instructions + tools made available to the LLM (and probably the thing that runs the LLM conversation in a loop.) An agent is collectively, the LLM plus the harness.
114.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
Huh, I just did basically the same thing. My requirements were not due to spending $300k/yr on parsing (lol), but I was amazed how far I got just asking the AI for progressively more functionality. My use case is a bit different. I wan
115.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
Well let’s hope, as Bush once said, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice… can’t get fooled again.”
116.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
It’s just embarrassing at this point. How long will the Americans put up with this humiliation ritual?
117.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
It seems some people in this thread are not :)
118.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
This is genuinely the least of my concerns. I just want the OS to be fast and lean.
119.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
No. The greater deterrent is to make the world so complexly integrated that such actions carry an enormous cost.
120.
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
I never mentioned the Cuban Missile Crisis. You’ve misinterpreted what I said. The USSR getting nukes in the first place lead to several incidents which were a judgment call away from armageddon. With the benefit of hindsight the correct ca

More ›