luord

96 ms·

901.
by luord 10y ago
SEEKING WORK - Colombia or Remote (GMT-6 to GMT-3) Primarily a full-stack developer (python and javascript) with experience in managing PostgreSQL and operations/infrastructure. My CV: https://luord.com/pages/resum
902.
by luord 10y ago
Came here to mention this one. Vue is nice and clear in all the ways React and Angular (both flavors) are not. It's just simple and enforces "good" practices by making sense of them.
903.
by luord 10y ago
I've never gotten into vlogs or podcasts. Why watch/listen something in an hour that can be read in ten minutes?
904.
by luord 10y ago
The other day I read a blog post that argued how "Fight for the users" should be a core tenet for every developer. I agree; and, unfortunately, the main undercurrent of the defense of electron, at least in this thread, is one of a
905.
by luord 10y ago
How so? It was directly addressing this: > Dynamic typing was popular some years ago, but opinions have changed.
906.
by luord 10y ago
> it's about the workload. ... Why did you repeat yourself? I already told you I agreed with you on that. Is it something specific you want me to tell you? It's going to be easier if you tell me what you want to read, otherwise
907.
by luord 10y ago
theoldreader.com for feeds. Google inbox. hashnode.com
908.
by luord 10y ago
> If you're using python, it can be the bottle neck > data processing workload you need to do in parallel It's funny how often those two go together, you're of course correct (for now). I never wrote that the language c
909.
by luord 10y ago
> Java or Go are easily 10 times faster than Python/Rail on the same hardware. (Potentially much more, especially when you have non trivial logic to process in the code). ... I know that, everyone here knows that ; saying it is lit
910.
by luord 10y ago
"Ship first, design later" is completely orthogonal to what language one's using. Using a language that forces one to write int or str before the variables isn't preventing anyone to write software without having a desig
911.
by luord 10y ago
This is weird. It's not a matter of what was popular a few years ago. Static typing didn't "stop" being popular while dynamic typing "was" popular, nor have opinions "changed". Dynamic and static typi
912.
by luord 10y ago
> You can always push a python/ruby app an order of magnitude by putting an order of magnitude more AWS instances. Or a Java app or a Go app. Really, if one's working in a domain where the language would become the bottleneck,
913.
by luord 10y ago
Exactly, I never understand the static vs dynamic flamewars. Most of the issues usually presented stem from poor developers or poor development processes/environments/tools. Poor code written in JavaScript won't become pretty
914.
by luord 10y ago
One I frequent is https://hashnode.com It's still not very big but seems to be growing. And it's completely bereft of political talk, which I find refreshing.
915.
by luord 10y ago
> avoid the perception of having a point of view, which leads to vapid, passive, easily exploitable schlock journalism. AKA merely reporting the facts and events without introducing someone's uncalled for opinion, which shows respec
916.
by luord 10y ago
> This articulates a lot of what I've felt in recent years. > Certainly Python sticks out in this regard. I also think Python has evolved beyond its initial premise. So with recent years you meant 1991. Got it, I got confused for
917.
by luord 10y ago
"Clear, concise, expressive code" isn't something that applies to ternary operators. They were always meant as shortcuts and, as such, will never be as clear as if else statements, practically by design. Though I don't r