> it's about the workload. ... Why did you repeat yourself? I already told you I agreed with you on that. Is it something specific you want me to tell you? It

> it's about the workload. ... Why did you repeat yourself? I already told you I agreed with you on that. Is it something specific you want me to tell you? It's going to be easier if you tell me what you want to read, otherwise we'll keep going in circles. > Quite easily [...] poor purpose That's an immediate contradiction. Yes, if one picks the wrong tool, that tool often becomes the bottleneck; but for every other scenario in which the tool is alright, it takes poor developers for the tool to become a bottleneck. In my first comment I wrote that the language isn't the bottleneck, except for specific circumstances... And you took one of those specific circumstances and keep running with it. It's not a counterargument to my original point, if that's what you're trying to do.