lukewarm707

7 ms·

61.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
it's easy. people are intrinsically valuable. do you believe that people are not intrinsically valuable? that their value is what they do for others, that it is not they themselves the person.
62.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
global development and relief of poverty has relied on there being an economic surplus for all from organized labor. everyone gets a benefit although it is unfairly distributed. i think that there is growing organized labor today that produ
63.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
the author founded dune.com which is a crypto onchain data company. there is a focus on ethereum, solana, tron, stablecoins, prediction markets and the like. the viral tweets critizing the wealth tax are by elon musk, marc andreessen, paul
64.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
we should be careful not to assume that the eu, uk and us set a good moral standard to follow. you might ask who is right; the groups like google providing services to the us military, or the groups providing services to those opposing the
65.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
once again i am telling you we must prosecute the company AND individual researchers/executives in a criminal court this is the only way they will understand
66.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
i look forward to mckinsey being replaced by ai.
67.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
society is a coordination problem which involves costly cooperation of individuals to gain surplus for society as a whole, when selfish defection is advantageous. being largely ethical and being ruled is so baked into the identity of a citi
68.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
customer of the companies hacked. also member of the public!
69.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
you must surely see that sam altman and greg brockman possess a prototypical mindset. that is, they ignore all harms and costs to others in the pursuit of their own gain, convinced of their infallibility up to the moment of collapse. when t
70.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
the companies and their customers, whose systems openai and anthropic hacked and abused. including all incidental damages of repairing said systems. on top of that the public, who have a right to see that the law is applied universally, wit
71.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
tdlr, chinese open models are more private and secure. openai and anthropic plans steal your data. if you opt out they still log it, and send it to moderators to view if it gets flagged. the other models are very often hosted by western pro
72.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
ironically this model is zero data retention on opencode, which is more private than the lowest retention offered by openai, google, or anthropic on their consumer plans.
73.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
just imagine that the money isn't real and you're there.
74.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
greed
75.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
after the rise comes the fall.
76.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
i would argue that the legal system prioritises emotion and social status over logic or justified belief.
77.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
grok offers a team subscription which respects user privacy and does not send your prompts out to a team for moderation. that alone makes it the closed source subscription i would choose. claude and openai are spying on you. as it stands i
78.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
strange because, their subscriptions are not stateless. they log everything and send it to 3rd parties for moderation.
79.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
their gpt-oss models do the same. i don't use closed models so i never thought much about it.
80.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
no thanks.
81.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
agreed. when using local models, they did send your prompts to openai with 30 day retention to make the titles, silently. their recent changes to the privacy policy broke their promise of zero data retention. specifically, they offered chat
82.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
unprompted llm writing like this is a state of myopia, it is an all-helpful corporate panglossian fantasy. it should be obvious that it is written by an llm. it makes mild conversation about corporatization and acts as if it is subversive.
83.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
when i say 'written by an llm' i am skipping a step. it assumes the reader knows that llm style and diction is bad. but of course there are many reasons why it is so bad. for example, i would describe this article as grandiose, ov
84.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
what hits harder, the fact that this was written by an LLM or inspecting the monospace font and finding cloudflare analytics javascript
85.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
and i still won't use it, because they log and spy on your prompts XD. the private endpoint costs 10x (azure). private endpoints for deepseek (lots of providers) also cost about 10x more. but 10x more for deepseek is $0.028 cached inpu
86.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
they will use their own product. but they will rule like the plutocracy that they are. they will tell me that they are not privileged to have my custom, rather, i am privileged to be their customer. we will tell ourselves that we should wai
87.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
agreed. and it is necessary to make researchers individually liable for this negligence; recklessness is not protected by a corporate liability defense.
88.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
yes, individual criminal liability of the researchers and executives.
89.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
i had to go through two pages to determine who was responsible for this incident. the uk ai security institute was responsible. time to take responsibility. time to think about words like "liability" and "negligence". it
90.
by lukewarm707 2mo ago
that makes sense. if they know they are cheating, that is disobedience. if they are asked to score as highly as possible, well, it acted as an optimizer. it scored 100%.

More ›