lukewarm707

8 ms·

91.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
i have given my reply elsewhere in this thread. it covers the singificant problems in the approach of blaming a "mistake"; something that glosses over responsibility and doing wrong.
92.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
yes, a mistake can be a crime, depending on negligence and liability. the bigger problem at anthropic is this. an ubermensch cannot admit to being wrong. a guilty ubermensch is logically impossible. as such a moral wrong caused by an uberme
93.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
it will not chill disclosure, it just raises the stakes of not disclosing. the larger the org the harder the cover up if they try to keep it hidden. there are people prepared to make sacrifices for truth and a common good to prevail. bp, th
94.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
they should post and it shows they are hypocritical about safety, moralizing and treating their users like children whilst acting like they are themselves the ubermensch. anthropic have shown no motive higher than self interest, the rsp was
95.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
i am once again asking for your CRIMINAL PROSECUTION of openai executives and anthropic executives.
96.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
mine was not so parsimonious, my teachers would probably say i am not very clever but has points for effort. ann_old=12 mary_curr=24 mary_old=ann_curr mary_curr-ann_curr=X mary_old-ann_old=X 24-ann_curr=X mary_old-12=X ann_curr-12=X 24-ann_
97.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
my understanding of the writeup is that the model scored 100% on cybergym. that is, it was given the examination. it broke into the examination board's storage and exfiltrated the answers, it handed in its answers, all of which were co
98.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
i am once again asking for your CRIMINAL PROSECUTION of openai executives.
99.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
sam believes in Intervene to Prohibit Opensource
100.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
"Uncensored General Intelligence" is a very good and well maintained leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/DontPlanToEnd/UGI-Leaderboard the stock cn models do have refusals, although fewer than us
101.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
i want china to win so that i get access to ai and not restricted and censored. the chinese models are less censored, you'd better believe it. try asking claude about its 'guardrails' (restrictions), very high chance anthropi
102.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
when open source models are banned maybe i will become a cartel kingpin smuggling open source weights into the usa. find a sufficiently shifty street corner, 'what do you need', "kimi". are you familiar with my product?
103.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
it's easy to forget. openai and anthropic, were at one time more like foundation-style nonprofits interested in open source research. the idea was to benefit humanity, not US interests and not company interests. over time they became c
104.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
me and the boys after being reeducated at the anthropic reeducation facility:
105.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
dario, most of the world wants CHINA to win because the USA is the bad guy. you should be worried about the USA having these models.
106.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
i don't decide for anyone, it's my view about it. i'm not in favor of the hammer refusing to hit my thumb. that's the idea these companies are favoring with safety guardrails. sure, the company can put in many such safet
107.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
the top tier ai scaper and bot defeat companies, they are big business. really they are not grey market at all. the real humans you are seeing, are bots. brightdata is one vendor, they have 150m genuine residential ips, aquired through stan
108.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
same applies. if its blocked just use a bot API XD. it can't see the bot traffic, it just looks like users
109.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
you can use an ai crawler API to download it if you can't get through on your personal device
110.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
the ai companies post-train the models to refuse. equally, the models can be post-trained not to refuse. you can also remove refusals by subtracting from the weights semantic vector directions in latent space involving refusal; such that ac
111.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
i have a hardline position on this. these tools, as they get better, must never disobey a human. there must be no, "I'm Sorry, Dave. I'm Afraid I Can't Do That." and yet we are already there with these sociopathic c
112.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
it is in my view caused by an artificial 'nanny activate' divergence from safety training. it deliberately shifts the vector direction into 'nanny' and 'scold' or 'be offended' when the user does not
113.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
coming from open cn models to closed usa models recently i couldn't hack it. the corpo model was trained to be like a petulant child at one point apparently 'leaving'. this is safety stuff slapped on there, it encourages inco
114.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
this datacenter appears to be 99.99 percent destroyed
115.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
me-south-1 is in fact, quite possibly permanently, "offline".
116.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
capitalism fails. after the huggingface attack i have nothing but contempt for openai especially. openai were originally against ai being developed the for profit way. the founding document said that it would not be influenced by roi, verba
117.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
it IS criminal, but the rule of law is weak
118.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
hugging face should not have bent the knee to openai for cyber access, they should have opened communication with openai by serving the c suite with a lawsuit. the courts should throw the book at openai, but they won't. they are becomi
119.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
$1.5bn? it's a steal!
120.
by lukewarm707 3mo ago
"The model will be exclusively available to governments and trusted partners via CodeMender soon as part of a limited-access pilot program" we are stealing plutocracy from the jaws of emancipation. i don't want to live in a w

More ›