lukewarm707

6 ms·

31.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
voluntarily is stretching it for an opt-out
32.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
assume all you want is the proof. now you have the proof. did openai make the world a better place, by turning on 300b tokens in 7 days and bulldozing members of the community who were also working on the problem? just to undercut a rival?
33.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
his choice to defend the indefensible.
34.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
as good academic conduct you may cite the source of the work you are quoting or paraphrasing. as bad academic conduct you may steal someone else's unpublished work, work on it yourself for a bit, and then publish it as your own work. a
35.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
"There's no reason to believe that anything they did in ChatGPT led to our solution" do you think that the model's proof was unrelated to being fed a solution that was close to completion? any comment on openai allegedly
36.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
if they do not deny training on them, they can't deny plagiarism.
37.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
"While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models" this is surely the line which confirms they plaigiarised the solution.
38.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
my reading was that openai did not deny plagiarising the approach from their prompts. openai then tried to effectively bribe buckmaster with a shared citation, whilst dropping his co-author who works for anthropic. after buckmaster refused,
39.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
i think that this case, if they did train on buckmaster and alpöge, amounts to an attempt to steal the millenium prize, bypassing all attribution. legally speaking, the default privacy notice gives them an irrevocable license to your conten
40.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
if training is on, they are reading user prompts. training is on by default.
41.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
please could you change 'drama' and 'accusation' to something more formal like 'allegation'. the paper makes a very serious allegation of dishonesty and possible academic misconduct. the governance and integrit
42.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
why should you have the RPG launcher and not me?
43.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
extinction is natural. we all go extinct.
44.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
"Open source models have a limited lifespan whether you like it or not". this tinpot dictator mindset is typical of anthropic. Who will decide how to use the power of ai...you? it is no surprise that the companies and safety insti
45.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
the openai blog. consider the opening line: "Last week, Hugging Face disclosed a new kind of security incident (opens in a new window)." the entire blog is written in the passive voice as if the event was an act of god. you did th
46.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
the economist is in the market for plausible-sounding prose. much like a large language model, the substance of the argument is a side effect.
47.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
i can agree with some of this but you are missing the point about the fish. the catch grows year on year. however the fish stock is depleted at a faster rate than it is replenished. it is unsustainable. the catch reaches a maximum and start
48.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
come on. you asked for a fuller justification and then disparage me for writing a screed and ted talk. those are my thoughts about it. nonetheless thank you for sharing a rejoinder.
49.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
looking back at anthropic's promises and committments, the key scaling policies were not upheld. to their credit they have kept the policies up on their website instead of trying to rewrite history. [ https://www.anthropic.
50.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
the claim that the other ai companies also did the same thing is pure speculation. the law places the burden of proof on the accuser. you can't accuse other companies of crime with no evidence, simply because you don't know if the
51.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
a) classic goodhart is using gdp as a measure of prosperity. the government sets a prosperity target. to increase prosperity the government makes workers increase gdp by working 16 hours per day. gdp increases. prosperity is up! the metric
52.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
yes, they are the source of the danger. they are the cause of this incident.
53.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
you say ai increases gdp growth, tax revenues and scientific innovations. then you say that ai is good. that is not formally valid. in between those two you are smuggling the assumption that gdp growth, tax revenues and scientific innovatio
54.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
if you could get a jury trial...
55.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
nobody has doubted that safety matters. the problem is that those preaching safety, openai and anthropic, are dishonest, sociopathic, and the very source of the danger.
56.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
we must as i have now said too many times, prosecute the individual researchers and executives in a criminal court. this is the only way to deter such activity. corporate fines are not enough. the charges are negligence, conspiracy and co
57.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
my messages are so gloomy because i am heartbroken, that given a technological miracle again, we could snatch tragedy from the jaws of our emancipation. will you not see that people could be truly empowered and yet will instead be oppressed
58.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
use 3rd party marketplaces. cerebras is resold on vercel, openrouter and huggingface.
59.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
it isn't.
60.
by lukewarm707 1mo ago
agreed. the pricing is a nightmare. either $20 for codex and up to 00 millions of tokens or $0.50 cache in per million in tee.

More ›