Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lukeschwartz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Is nobody else surprised the amount is so low? If you look at his video catalogue, basically every video is a "hit" even if upload frequency is relatively low. Youtubers making 20 videos a month with <1M views/video make c
2.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Tim's great. Why is his face on the slide though? :)
3.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Never heard of Pyret[0] before. Looks good. This data-centric introduction to computing is also rather interesting [1]. [0]( https://www.pyret.org/ ) [1]( https://www.dcic-world.org/ )
4.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
propaganda.
5.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
You're guaranteed to make little money, yes. The big publishers make most of their revenue from a small number of titles that make publishing any other title viable.
6.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
The comment should have been the post. And this is the unsurprising TLDR: "The long and short of it is publishing is very much a gambler's game, and I think that has been clear from the testimony in the DOJ case. It is true that m
7.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Perhaps, https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/HSIPR-v1-Guide-June2...
8.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
There's some counterarguments in the references. A quick Google search for the opposite side does little help. This is the "best" I could find https://www.greenbiz.com/article/why-us-needs-get-track-high.
9.
▲
The High‐Speed Rail Money Sink (2021)
(cato.org)
2 points
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
|
2 comments
10.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
It brings millions of dollars.
11.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
The title should be "Scientific harassment"; obsessively criticizing science is how we do science.
12.
▲
Quantum Randomness by Scott Aaronson
(americanscientist.org)
1 points
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
Could one single machine invent everything? (2018)
(mindmatters.ai)
1 points
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
Reverse engineering WoW before release
(web.archive.org)
2 points
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
wow, $409,644.10/year; now I really wonder how much money they make from donations.
16.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
https://github.com/mwmbl/mwmbl#frequently-asked-question
17.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Never thought real-time searching will be so cool https://mwmbl.org
18.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
> We need a way to make the entire privacy invasion business not profitable. i.e., How to pay for the Web (and all other related privacy-invasive platforms) without ads?
19.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Isn't it an issue of the entire model though. The Web is free, as in you pay with your data. The Web can be completely free for you and a number of others as long as enough people are actually paying with their data (to offset you et a
20.
▲
Ask HN: Is online privacy possible without legislation?
9 points
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
|
7 comments
21.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Shouldn't this be considered a news aggregator (e.g., Google News), instead of a news website? Regardless, I do believe an even simpler aggregator fetching only AP/Reuters could be maintained with something like Brave rewards in t
22.
▲
by
lukeschwartz
4y ago
Construction should never stop; build, modify, tear, repeat.