lukaszwojtow

5 ms·

1.
by lukaszwojtow 1y ago
I'm working on Alis Studio ( https://github.com/alphatica/alis )- software to manage portfolios and research stock market ideas. It's an MVP but perfectly usable. I needed features that I couldn't find any
2.
Show HN: Algo-Trading Software(github.com)
2 points by lukaszwojtow 1y ago|0 comments
3.
by lukaszwojtow 2y ago
Old lcamtuf is back!
4.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
I feel the same. I think they realise it, but for the lack of better ideas, this is what shareholders want. It's like "we have to collect data, because everyone does it, and use it for anything"
5.
Qpackt- a Modern Web Server(qpackt.com)
1 points by lukaszwojtow 3y ago|0 comments
6.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Using the code later in a non open-source project can happen also with MIT/Apache licensed code. Even without CLA. Does it mean that company that does it is immoral?
7.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
I get it. If there are alternatives that overall would be better (including their technical merits and how easy it is to introduce them to a commercial company) then use them. No one is forced to buy dual-license.
8.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Good. So now Redis Inc is in trouble because they have to replace community work with their own. If community does most of the work, then what's the problem?
9.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Yes, they paid. And they can use the code they paid for. But it doesn't give them right to leech of any future code written by someone else IN THE FUTURE.
10.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
All this outcry about license switch coming from "community" feels funny. After all, if there is the "community" then they can take the last open-source version and keep developing it themselves, right? But most "co
11.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
If AGPL blocks adoption then "large orgs" can buy commercial license (assuming software is dual-licensed).
12.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Problem: They want someone else to maintain this feature long-term.
13.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
I guess they can fork that "open core", introduce that feature, then maintain it themselves forever. Pull changes from original open core and their "open" branch will be better than original. Of course they don't wa
14.
Should I Require CLA?(github.com)
2 points by lukaszwojtow 3y ago|0 comments
15.
Show HN: Serve multiple versions of your website(github.com)
2 points by lukaszwojtow 3y ago|1 comments
16.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Hi all! I'm working on a web server that is able to serve multiple versions of a web site. Can be useful to prevent broken link errors (when a new site is deployed between a user's clicks), A/B testing (the server has some ba
17.
Mutation Testing in Rust(qpackt.com)
2 points by lukaszwojtow 3y ago|1 comments
18.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Hi guys! I did a little write up about my approach to mutation testing, and why it's a valuable tool. Any constructive criticism is welcomed.
19.
Show HN: Qpackt – web server that can serve two versions of your website(qpackt.com)
4 points by lukaszwojtow 3y ago|1 comments
20.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Try coralogix.
21.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Explanation about syncookies is soooo wrong that it's funny. Was this hallucination generated by chat gpt?
22.
by lukaszwojtow 3y ago
Did Ada zealots try? Do you have a link to their proposal?
23.
by lukaszwojtow 4y ago
I always prefer by-borrow. That's because in the future this struct may become non-copy and that means some unnecessary refactoring. My thinking is a bit like "don't take ownership if not needed" - the "not needed&q
24.
by lukaszwojtow 4y ago
Does a digger replace a shovel? 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Huge. IMVHO we need serious government involved to help people transition. AI is just a tool, just like a digger that made some things possible/cost effective (that weren't before).
25.
Ask HN: How to Ensure Correct Encryption?
4 points by lukaszwojtow 4y ago|1 comments
26.
by lukaszwojtow 4y ago
No, this one: https://matrix.org/blog/2022/09/13/security-release-of-matri... Thanks for the link to EMS.
27.
by lukaszwojtow 4y ago
Yeah, I looked at matrix and it's really cool. But: 1. recent security problems make it a hard sell to my manager, 2. People behind Matrix don't seem to care about getting this in commercial usage.
28.
Ask HN: Would you recommend such software in your org?
1 points by lukaszwojtow 4y ago|6 comments
29.
by lukaszwojtow 4y ago
Very simple backup / encryption tool written in Rust. Private/public key encryption, 100% mutation coverage, very small code base.
30.
Show HN(github.com)
2 points by lukaszwojtow 4y ago|2 comments

More ›