luigip

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by luigip 14y ago

   Some more discussion of these monitors here: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/news_archive/26.htm#korean_ips27
2. 2.▲
   by luigip 15y ago

   I bet the value of metals on Earth already far exceeds this many times over. And what do you think would happen to the price of metals if you had this huge supply?
3. 3.▲
   by luigip 15y ago

   You could make exactly the same argument, with the "action" as keeping funding NASA. We need to establish that giving ANOTHER $18 billion is a good use of funds compared to leaving it in the taxpayers' pocket. Any economist will tell you th
4. 4.▲
   by luigip 15y ago

   This argument is often trotted out, but it doesn't hold water if you think about it. There may be some examples where the technology has been re-used, but what's their value in terms of useful research quantitatively, rather than hand-wavin
5. 5.▲
   by luigip 15y ago

   And $1 billion to Nasa today means another billion next year, and the year after that...