luesterklemme

5 ms·

1.
by luesterklemme 4mo ago
What are you reasonably expecting to find in a full body MRI? Besides the notion that a "full body MRI" is not a procedure that is routinely done anyway and lasts upwards of an hour. It's not the scanner that is the limiting
2.
by luesterklemme 11mo ago
DB Schenker was sold recently. So your point is not entirely correct anymore. Also yes, it did invest tax payer money but was profitable doing so.
3.
by luesterklemme 2y ago
I guess "änderbar".
4.
by luesterklemme 2y ago
The "reverse" effect would be a Nocebo. Which also exists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nocebo
5.
by luesterklemme 3y ago
Nice point except coal was not ramped up. You can argue that it was not ramped down and could have been phased out more quickly but you also have to look at the political discussion at the time of deciding to put a stop on nuclear.
6.
by luesterklemme 6y ago
The incentive of the GDPR is for the companies to place inherent value in their data safety. So either the companies can pay and not invest in future safety to come out cheaper in the short run with the added risk of future attacks. Or they
7.
by luesterklemme 6y ago
Different sector, different country, different regulatory body, different regulator. Maybe the fines are comparable but I have my doubts that this could ever be a viable strategy. But in any case that is not the problem of the regulations.
8.
by luesterklemme 6y ago
Because a lot of people just get this whole thing wrong. This whole discussion got poisoned by fear mongering and not understanding of the actual rules. Yes you can be liable to a huge amount but you will be only be hit by that if you are e
9.
by luesterklemme 7y ago
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/04/planting... ETH Zürich seems to disagree with that statement.