luckylion

8 ms·

91.
by luckylion 11mo ago
Maybe. would be a rare sight, because the anti-israel crowd was primarily celebrating on oct 7th (an invasion), and is silent on russia's invasion of ukraine (because russia is allied with Hamas & Iran). And they trace their grieva
92.
by luckylion 11mo ago
It's not super common, but common enough that I don't want to deal with it. The other part is just how convenient it is with CF. Easy to configure, plenty of power and cheap compared to the other big ones. If they made their dashb
93.
by luckylion 11mo ago
It's not necessarily going through a Russian or Singaporean node though, on the sites I'm responsible for, AWS, GCP, Azure are in the top 5 for attackers. It's just that they don't care _at all_ about that happening. I d
94.
by luckylion 11mo ago
It helps separate principled people from others. Some will say "countries must never be invaded, occupied, or annexed", others will add "... if it's done by Israel, but I'll absolutely ignore/support it if it&#
95.
by luckylion 11mo ago
Consistency. "This must never stand" vs "This must not stand in this particular case only because it negatively affects my group".
96.
by luckylion 11mo ago
Primarily, it will get you lots of candidates, some of them good. And between those who are good, some of them will be eager to work, and others are eager to coast by. Hard to predict in all roles, not just technical ones.
97.
by luckylion 11mo ago
Has anyone tried to claim that lying on status pages is securities fraud? 100% uptime for Slack in this quarter? I guess that calculation is "not every user tried to connect when we were down, so technically we weren't down for 10
98.
by luckylion 11mo ago
This is the same on a lot of larger staffing agencies that promise to have all the people you need and can either do entire projects for you, or get you developers, designers, QA, project managers etc on short notice. They have a few very c
99.
by luckylion 1y ago
I doubt robots.txt would fit. robots.txt allows or disallows access, but it does not state any claim. You can license content you don't own, put it on your website, and then exclude it in robots.txt without that implying any claims of
100.
by luckylion 1y ago
Ad companies, even the small ones, "Brand Protection" companies, IP lawyers looking for images that were used without license, Brand Marketing companies, where it matters also your competitors etc etc
101.
by luckylion 1y ago
If they even are AI crawlers. Could be just as well some exploit-scanners that are searching for endpoints they'd try to exploit. That wouldn't require storing the content, only the links.
102.
by luckylion 1y ago
"blind" isn't a noun though. "a noun person" is what you mentioned, but "an adjective person" is different. A tall person isn't all about their height, they're just way above average in height. &
103.
by luckylion 1y ago
if they will lose data when you're on a rarely used browser, can you really trust them not to lose data in general? "yes, your car exploded, but you were driving on a dirt drive way. it works just fine on the highway"
104.
by luckylion 1y ago
Likely country blocks in this case, can't have the mean Europeans read the precious content. Works fine with a US VPN (bad IP reputation), doesn't work with my german local provider (good IP reputation).
105.
by luckylion 1y ago
Minitel in France, Btx in Germany and undoubtedly other system already had millions of users when the WWW was "invented", and were arguably what it was the next generation of. It was quite the improvement, but yeah, the article so
106.
by luckylion 1y ago
You're living in Berlin, the city that is subsidized to the sum of 3.8bn Euros by the much more rural southern states. And yet somehow _they_ are the ones who don't want to pay their share? Berlin does things to people.
107.
by luckylion 1y ago
You could also sign an NDA. And then you'd be bound by that NDA to not disclose the information it is protecting. Should penalties from that should also be non-enforceable because it would limit what you can say?
108.
by luckylion 1y ago
Does that have any implications on liability for content? They're no longer just a provider, they are re-licensing and marketing content. Are they losing protection?
109.
by luckylion 1y ago
My point is that micro-studies like that on a tiny random (or even counter-indicated, "healthy") selection of the general population don't tell you much for drugs that do specific things. "Antibiotics don't improve
110.
by luckylion 1y ago
Research on _13_ people, that's a very important caveat when evaluating something like adderal.
111.
by luckylion 1y ago
> We've managed to go 80-odd years with a reasonable global norm against redrawing borders, and it is worth a lot to demonstrate that we- the global community- do not acquiesce The previous Russian imperial project, the Soviet Union
112.
by luckylion 1y ago
I suppose the title should be _Minimalist_ CSS Framework. At 71kb it really isn't minimal.
113.
by luckylion 1y ago
But globes aren't really that practical for navigation. You can plan your voyage, but when you're at sea, how do you make sure you're going in the right direction? Mercator has the advantage that you can use your compass and
114.
by luckylion 1y ago
> Despite the rush to integrate powerful new models, about 5% of AI pilot programs achieve rapid revenue acceleration; the vast majority stall, delivering little to no measurable impact on P&L. [1] "We wanted to make money with
115.
by luckylion 1y ago
Did they have better map projections for cross-oceanic navigation 500 years ago when the mercator projection was invented?
116.
by luckylion 1y ago
> However, ask yourself why the mercator projection was so popular for so long, and why resistance to other projections took so long to counter. Wasn't that primarily because of sea trade and the mercator projection being very usefu
117.
by luckylion 1y ago
Has fortune.com followed forbes.com in renting out their authority to random people/entities who want to publish something on their site? I guess this doesn't fall under Site Reputation Abuse for google. But why not?
118.
by luckylion 1y ago
Within six (?) weeks, you can simply charge back and the money will be back in your account very quickly. After that, it's a much more formal process where your bank has to get in contact with the other bank and it can take weeks.
119.
by luckylion 1y ago
> I'm not defining liberties as privileges, I'm merely pointing out that your right to liberty ends where it infringes on somebody else's (and vice versa). Yet you included privileges (like getting tax-funded things) in th
120.
by luckylion 1y ago
> But giving you a gun limits my liberty, because I would feel threatened and unable to express myself fully in a society where I would have to assume that random people on the street carry guns. Yes, I understand the point. There are ot

More ›