lucb1e

40 ms·

511.
by lucb1e 1y ago
We also started having customers since a few years that declare GitHub fully trusted, as in, it is simply not worth considering what the impact would be if that vendor gets compromised. I can't name names, but this includes a vendor th
512.
by lucb1e 1y ago
I use git pretty basically, just as a revision system where the hosted version has some nice-to-haves on top like rendering markdown, permalinking bits of code to people, and being able to open tickets and contribute code. Gitea/Forgej
513.
by lucb1e 1y ago
I think that's a different discussion. Some people would like their chat messages to simply be secure until they die. So long as that's a valid desire, or one can think of another purpose for this, I think we can agree that it&#x2
514.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Besides what's public knowledge, I tend to put a bit of stock in our intelligence agency calling for PQ adoption for systems that need to remain confidential for 20 years or more edit: adding in some sources 2014: "between 2030 an
515.
by lucb1e 1y ago
> First: it's not five years. It's five years if you posit that macs are magic and use no energy[1]. Huh? I'm not "positing" anything, I'm responding to the longevity you stated: > you'd be looking a
516.
by lucb1e 1y ago
A device with no moving parts, only 5 years of expected life?! I understand if you say that high-performance users will want a newer system after 5 years, but I'd be very surprised if this 64GB RAM machine doesn't suffice for 98%
517.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Similar with phones and tablets: yes, people do that, but it's not the common case. I've only ever sold computing devices within the first month of ownership, after realising I made a mistake in purchasing it (not a broken device,
518.
by lucb1e 1y ago
So you recover what you spent extra, per the article?
519.
by lucb1e 1y ago
> The Framework Desktop with 64GB RAM + 2TB NVMe is $1,876. To get a Mac Studio with similar specs [...] you'll literally spend nearly twice as much [...] The Framework Desktop is simply a great deal. Wow, someone managed to beat Ap
520.
by lucb1e 1y ago
The only complaint on a fresh install is that Cinnamon seems to use a ton of CPU when there's a little moving thingy anywhere on the screen (a browser tab that has a loading icon in the tab list is sufficient). This is most noticeable
521.
by lucb1e 1y ago
> "trixie" includes numerous updated software packages (over 63% of all packages from the previous release) Wow, I'm amazed a third of packages haven't seen an update in, ehm checks > After 2 years, 1 month, and
522.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Imagine we wouldn't tell criminals the law because they might try to find holes... This is just user-hostile and security through obscurity. If someone on HN knows that this is what is shown to banned people then so will the people tha
523.
by lucb1e 1y ago
(I laughed out loud.) Hey! I liked Google+ >:( Met some cool people on that site and I guess my thought was that anything is better than a facebook monopoly on social media and this has an actual chance
524.
by lucb1e 1y ago
I'm not that interested in visiting the USA right now gotta be honest
525.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Agree it's intrusive on all sites, but that is like the last place where I want to make mental space for "hey btw big brother is tracking you here too ;)" reminder popups
526.
by lucb1e 1y ago
I might consider switching back to Google Search if there were a "put any good results without tracking wall up top" setting
527.
by lucb1e 1y ago
I remember upon introduction, tech news would jokingly refer to it as the porn button if they were immature enough (and let's face it, back then most of us and the web news sites were quite literally immature). Sounds like that would
528.
by lucb1e 1y ago
There's a reason pornhub and reddit won over other sites where there was more shit in your face (not meant to be read literally)
529.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Chrome has it built into the browser. If you fake the Chrome user agent string from Firefox, it'll also not show up (but you shoot yourself in the foot in other ways so I'm not advising that). Or so I heard on Mastodon a few days
530.
by lucb1e 1y ago
> note: I'm not excusing the feature but come on! Have some common sense before visiting a site like that? I first read this as directed at the person you're replying to (me) but then saw a second possible reading: the site sho
531.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Does nobody find this intrusive when it appears on sites like pornhub? Of all places where I'd sign in with a Google account... holy heck, I was very surprised they chose to let Google do that nearly-fullscreen popup on their site u
532.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Wasn't it like 2$ in electricity for every 1$ they take in revenue at OpenAI? I think it was a Flemish podcast where they mentioned that such numbers had leaked (episode was recorded a month ago), hard to find back among a 2-hour podca
533.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Exactly! And then you alienate the top 10% fans among the members that ever go (since 10% of those 50% is 5%). They must know this is terrible for the brand so I guess there is a real good financial reason for doing this (Congrats on 777 ka
534.
by lucb1e 1y ago
> affecting less than 5% of users Probably phrased to sound like little but as someone used to seeing like 99% (or, conversely, 1% down) as a bad uptime affecting lots and lots of users, this feels massive. If you have half a million use
535.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Recently learned of this from the german-spoken podcast AstroGeo. If someone wants to listen to this Large Numbers Hypothesis story in podcast form, I enjoyed that episode: https://astrogeo.de/expandierende-erde-zu-grosse-za
536.
by lucb1e 1y ago
Monospaced fonts always bother me when I use them in emails or on websites. Never the same size as the prose. This is great for websites at least! Wonder if I could find an HTML mode to use in Thunderbird and if any email client would under
537.
by lucb1e 1y ago
So like a semi-public endpoint, that the libraries can access but not the general public, and then the public should get it from the libraries? Seems roundabout but it fits with what I've read so far
538.
by lucb1e 1y ago
I quoted from there, so yes
539.
by lucb1e 1y ago
I'm having trouble finding what this means. Does IA now have new obligations, or gets new information, or something else, or all of the above? The submission says: > These records account for “millions and millions of pages” that ca
540.
by lucb1e 1y ago
"This repository was about ~80% AI generated"

More ›