lucasgerads

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lucasgerads 5mo ago

   There is definitely some truth to that. I am an EE and have played around with some of the prompt -> schematic tools. If I need 10mins to prompt it to draw the inverting op-amp amplifier circuit that I need. It is pointless. I can draw t
2. 2.▲
   by lucasgerads 5mo ago

   I had some success with using Claude in conjunction with my oscilloscope and spice simulations. I think it is an under explored space so far. In case you are interested: https://lucasgerads.com/blog/lecroy-mcp-spice-dem
3. 3.▲
   by lucasgerads 6mo ago

   I feel like a year ago I would have said impossible. Now, I am not so sure anymore. Although, if I wrote the prompt and the correct result would be presented to me I wouldn't even know. Would still need a mathematician to verify it.
4. 4.▲
   by lucasgerads 6mo ago

   I usually try to review all the code written by claude. And also let claude review all the code that i write. So, usually I have some understanding of what is going on. And Claude definitely sometimes makes "unconventional" decisi
5. 5.▲
   by lucasgerads 6mo ago

   It is 2kWh and above. My e-bike has 500Wh, which I think is fairly standard. A smartphone with 2kWh would be, let’s say, rather unconventional. [1] https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/fil.
6. 6.▲
   by lucasgerads 6mo ago

   I am building a dev envirnmont to use Claude Code (or other agentic coding tools) for electronics development. I give Claude access to my lab equipment like my scope. That way I can let claude programm an MCU and at the same time verify tha