luc_

4 ms·

1.
by luc_ 12d ago
Why do you need to review design decisions with a team anymore? I get the impression that Fable, when well directed, is better than maybe 80% of SWEs. Maybe more. [edit: Yes, I'm maybe baiting other users, but I want to know your hones
2.
by luc_ 12d ago
I think we definitely need to have alignment, and documentation to support it. I think this can be at the PRD level, mostly. For many systems, I'd argue technical documentation to understand how the internals are working can simply be
3.
by luc_ 12d ago
Can you summarize your thoughts into a single prompt that, with the context of the codebase, gets expanded to something that makes sense?
4.
by luc_ 12d ago
For an entire project? Yes I agree. For a feature or a submodule? I think when you work with claude to develop a plan, it's generally pretty good. I guess my question stems from being rigid how a design doc should be defined, argued ov
5.
by luc_ 12d ago
I think in the age of AI coding, these rationales are a bit outdated. And if you think they're not - I'm curious to know why you think so.
6.
by luc_ 3mo ago
Top 2 comments fail to acknowledge the elephant in the room. It's not about the tech. We have a corrupt administration gatekeeping two powerful models for companies set to go public soon. I bet the models are powerful. I also bet there
7.
by luc_ 4mo ago
How we learn has gotta change...
8.
by luc_ 4mo ago
Imperfect example, but nuclear. We regulate that. Sure the US and other nuclear powers build it, and we have side effects of mutually assured destruction to keep us at bay, and other countries off the table. Maybe this shows that there are
9.
by luc_ 6mo ago
Capitol Reef is ridiculous. There's no fish.
10.
by luc_ 6mo ago
I don't think they are, I think they're not talking about that... "It's all about the spec."
11.
by luc_ 6mo ago
Fits with the origin story of Claude Code...
12.
by luc_ 6mo ago
Setting the plot for Angels and Demons... :D Mirror: https://archive.ph/JkeMp
13.
by luc_ 6mo ago
Drugs.
14.
by luc_ 7mo ago
yet another roll your own ROS...
15.
by luc_ 7mo ago
^ Big this. If we take a pessimistic attitude, we're done for.
16.
by luc_ 9mo ago
I wonder if the new models consider land use change and emissions from aggressive datacenter development and model training...
17.
by luc_ 10mo ago
++ When an EU outlet says, "Given the annual savings, this sum will pay for itself in less than a year. In the past, the state transferred millions to the US company Microsoft, primarily for the use of office software and other program
18.
by luc_ 10mo ago
Too big to fail?
19.
by luc_ 10mo ago
Finally, don't have to remember the UMRN for Camptown Races anymore.
20.
by luc_ 10mo ago
> “give people mental health breaks.” try going outside
21.
by luc_ 11mo ago
I wonder how these pieces of understanding can be applied to neuroscience.
22.
by luc_ 11mo ago
Maybe I'll vibecode that this weekend...
23.
by luc_ 1y ago
Reminds me of when I was working on NVIDIA Jetson systems, and learning how to use them, that you can run 1 command to make everything go faster... ( https://jetsonhacks.com/2019/04/10/jetson-nano-use-more-powe
24.
by luc_ 1y ago
Loved this too hahaha..
25.
by luc_ 1y ago
Yeah real talk. It can really play to folks bias towards laziness and the fact that it's being controlled by corporations / (the few) / (the ultra-wealthy) should give us pause to consider the level of control it does and wil
26.
by luc_ 1y ago
I think that there's something to be said about brain cycles being freed up for different things. We were relieved of some manual tasks during the industrial revolution. Now what else are our brains free to do? That's not to say t
27.
by luc_ 1y ago
We're choosing to offload processing that our brain could be doing but we're too lazy to do it or the perceived value for us to do it is. I think there are consequences to this especially as we give the machine free information of
28.
by luc_ 1y ago
bless this mess
29.
by luc_ 2y ago
Yes, C++ may even be too far. Writing C in a very regimented way to run on very old processors by today's standards is 'aerospace grade (tm)'.
30.
by luc_ 2y ago
Looks convenient, but another step towards a monoculture internet. :(

More ›