ls66

3 ms·

1.
by ls66 10y ago
Actually, saving the worst until just right before the election could be interpreted as saying 'hey I did my job and didn't wait until after' while still ensuring that any investigation and finding would not happen until some
2.
by ls66 10y ago
Career government officials are not likely to be activist about investigations. As with Clinton's denials, which are very passive and "I didn't know" or didn't question something, one can cover oneself very well by
3.
by ls66 10y ago
Not to mention that waiting until after means she controls informally if not formally many of the levers that would be used in the investigation. Can a sitting president be trusted not to interfere in any way possible in an investigation t
4.
by ls66 10y ago
Her campaign staff certainly cared about this issue.
5.
by ls66 11y ago
This ignores the fact that whack-a-mole has almost certainly indeed thwarted other attacks that would have otherwise sailed through. The problem is complex, no doubt, but I think for a civilized society pursuing this individually is almost
6.
Ask HN: Difficulty taking charge as PM
1 points by ls66 11y ago|1 comments
7.
by ls66 11y ago
I would agree in general that the left has appropriated and advocates the kind of extreme, life-changing response to perceived enemies that it has accused the right of using. I do think that ultimately there will be backlash against this.
8.
Ask HN: How to get a general tech background?
4 points by ls66 12y ago|1 comments
9.
by ls66 12y ago
I think anyone who is capable of graduating from a college, even a flawed one, as she did, has a hard time portraying themselves as vulnerable. At what point is someone responsible. She even graduated, so she has a degree and can legally st