lozzo

11 ms·

61.
by lozzo 9y ago
Very neat and straight to the point. I have bookmarked it.
63.
by lozzo 9y ago
Yet another site that you have to put your details before you can get a sense of what it is, what it does and whether it is worth it or not.
64.
by lozzo 9y ago
this was a key answer to a good question. I think you should emphasize that part (handling large data sets) as a key aspect of datasette
65.
by lozzo 9y ago
very good. I wonder if somebody really needs this.
66.
by lozzo 9y ago
I don't think you should apologize. I too think it's a terrible idea. And the irony it's that the author called the library "clarify".
67.
by lozzo 9y ago
Not a great start for me: Uncaught ReferenceError: red is not defined at navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition (script.js:22)
68.
by lozzo 9y ago
I saw your site. navigated it a little and eventually ended up in amazon getting a book on elon musk
69.
by lozzo 9y ago
impressive. You would deserve more stars on github... World is an unfair place.
70.
by lozzo 9y ago
I am coming from london and it's redirecting me here: https://grabblr.com/nl and my dutch is not that great :-)
71.
by lozzo 9y ago
This is brilliant... It took me some time to understand how it worked as it starts up with a demo... The idea of writing music in JavaScript is phenomenal well done
72.
by lozzo 9y ago
Noooooooooooo.... I looked at your code and you are using JQuery.... there is NOOOO point for such a simple site. p.s. I will send a link to my pals when they ask me if I want to go for a beer
73.
by lozzo 9y ago
That is a fine JS editor you have got up there. we should create links for most of those w t f s here https://github.com/denysdovhan/wtfjs
74.
by lozzo 9y ago
is this really something you want to show on hackernews ? why not asking stackoverflow community for this ?
75.
by lozzo 9y ago
I tried it with my website. It spotted google analytics (correct) and HTML5 (correct again) I was curious to see if it was going to work out that I am running it against Google App Engine but it did not figure that
76.
by lozzo 9y ago
Frankly, this is probably one of the so many useless projects that are around, yet credits to you for having done it in less than 1KB
77.
by lozzo 9y ago
Cute work. Well done. And also Well done for choosing a beatles'tune. Here in action: https://sequential.js.org/live.html#DYewhgJgFA5AFgFwQBwM4C4D...
78.
by lozzo 9y ago
sure and it's cute that you can interact with them. but wouldn't a codepen or jsfiddle or sequentialjs snippet good enough.
79.
by lozzo 9y ago
Given the title, I was quite to read some kind of article explaining why perfectionism might kill my startup. wrong. Yours is just an add. why not just sending us straight to your site ? So bad for your "Minimum Viable Product" wh
80.
by lozzo 9y ago
Hi there, Quickly gone through your webpage. First impression it looks nice and slick. And I get what you are about. Heads you left some console.log around (could see them on the chrome dev console) good luck
81.
by lozzo 9y ago
Very interesting work. Good luck with it. As a father of a bilingual child I was happy to stumble on this while browsing hacker news.
82.
by lozzo 9y ago
Many comments are saying that the article is not good as it is not accurate. (e.g. @masklinn) I agree. The author could have spent a bit of time reasarching this since bullet-point-articles are probably the easiest to write down. However, i
83.
by lozzo 9y ago
awesome stuff. I took a look at the code and I was marvelling on how clever the solution is. In particular in creating the 'mock' code. //> const $$STx89 = Iroh.stages["$$STx89"]; //> var $$fram
84.
by lozzo 9y ago
Cute tool. I like the way you highlight the 'matched' section on the textarea. Couldn't you have done it all in a codepen ?
85.
by lozzo 9y ago
Before giving my details I always take a look at the site. If it looks professional and maybe I might indulge. The problem here is that it would take any half decent developer less than a day to knock up a website similar to yours. So why s
86.
by lozzo 9y ago
Fantastic. I bookmarked the page and will check it again. I would like to order one for my kids.
87.
by lozzo 9y ago
Well done: in my opinion you built something that people want. In your FAQ you wrote: At the heart of CheckPhish, is an Artificial Intelligence based engine that looks for indicators in a website in realtime and ranks it for phishing. This
88.
by lozzo 9y ago
I am in my 40s and have a relatively safe job and not looking for a change. A friend of mine told me to apply for a certain company and I did. They asked me to free an hour one evening and they put me through hackerrank. And I failed. I fai
89.
by lozzo 9y ago
This is one of those chicken and egg websites. (like stackoverflow). It's only useful once you reach a good traction. I wish you luck. I would find it useful
90.
by lozzo 9y ago
the link on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging is broken. fix it

More ›