lozzo

11 ms·

91.
by lozzo 9y ago
I applaude you. This is a pretty impressive work. I could not find an 'about' link to explain to me how you guys put this together.
92.
by lozzo 9y ago
Just a suggestion: after uploading a logo it would be nice if I could share the URL of the results. And this would make your site more popular
93.
by lozzo 9y ago
which version of Java ?
94.
by lozzo 9y ago
here is the thing: This looks interesting but your page is missing basic information. Where are the 'about' 'contact' link ? who are you ? How do I know you are not going to spam or sell my emails
95.
by lozzo 9y ago
I am glad I stumbled on you. This is a useful aggregator. I particularly like the fact that it's not asking anybody to upvote/downvote the result of the aggregation. Good luck with it.
96.
by lozzo 9y ago
It looks interesting. A place I could bookmark for later visits. However, there are no info whatsoever on who's curating it and what criteria are used on the curation.
97.
by lozzo 9y ago
I am very skeptical about this service. Aside from cosmetic changes (which should be automated anyway) code reviews are better served by people who know intimately the problem we are trying to solve. Some code could look pretty neat (and p
98.
by lozzo 9y ago
Interesting. how does it work ?
99.
by lozzo 9y ago
I know some people who write excellent JS libraries, submit their work on GitHub, post their work on HackerNews and others and get either unnoticed or collect a handful of stars. It's sad to see that five.js has more than 800 stars on
100.
by lozzo 9y ago
do transpilers count ? if yes, then prepack, babeljs
101.
by lozzo 9y ago
I would show all entries, and not give any option to show just 10,20, 50... there is no advantage in that since everything is in memory
102.
by lozzo 9y ago
well done. nice and simple
103.
by lozzo 9y ago
can you do another for dog lovers ?
104.
by lozzo 9y ago
I did not get the point of this.
105.
by lozzo 9y ago
the article is interesting yet based. Most notably, it's clearly written by an old programmer.
106.
by lozzo 9y ago
this is lovely. good luck.
107.
by lozzo 9y ago
it would be nice to have a bit of explanation on how it works and why we can be confident that we can rely upon it
108.
by lozzo 9y ago
nice and simple keep up
109.
by lozzo 9y ago
this page has to be bookmarked. well done
110.
by lozzo 9y ago
okay this is hackernews and there are tons of similar sites to videocyborg ... so can you tell us what's so special about yours ? thanks
111.
by lozzo 9y ago
This looks very interesting. Is the code on github ? and if not what's the reason ?
112.
by lozzo 9y ago
any reason for not putting this book on github you would hopefully get stars and various encouragements and it would be more transparent to the whole community
113.
by lozzo 9y ago
where is the about page ? The product looks interesting but how could I trust a site without any info about its authors ?
114.
by lozzo 9y ago
Thanks. good reading... although I would argue that other categories need to (learn to) write too. Developers for instance.