loveistheanswer

8 ms·

31.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>mRNA technology has been in development for many years with much of the effort going into studies of human safety. Have there been any long term human trials of mRNA vaccines?
32.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Scientists don't know what causes auto immune reactions/disorders, or why they have seemingly been on the rise for decades.
33.
Facebook will no longer remove claims that Covid-19 was man-made(cnn.com)
103 points by loveistheanswer 5y ago|63 comments
34.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
What is the "mechanism" from the vaccine which has caused some people to get thrombocytopenia, bells palsy, temporary deafness, and other such side effects in just the short term?
35.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>free expression is only temporarily inconvenienced if one is told to express elsewhere, while free association is inalterably destroyed if one cannot ask someone to leave your private property based on their behavior. Were not talking a
36.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Seems like the cat was out of the bag at that point as the virus had already traveled across the world. If there was ever at all a chance at stopping it, it was in November and December of 2019 when Chinese doctors were sounding the alarm b
37.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Thats a subjective question. My answer: to live life fully with what little time we have. Memento mori.
38.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Smallpox only transmitted through humans. If you want to attempt to erradicate covid19, you'll also have to vaccinate all the animals, wild and domesticated, which carry the virus.
39.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>What's the mechanism you're concerned about? What do you mean? We can't know what the long term side effects of drugs are until we have long term data. Even with long term data showing significant negative side effects of
40.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Sure, go ahead, think it's over... but what is over is a normal world. We HAD the chance to stop this, but blew it. At what point did we have a chance to stop this?
41.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Private entities have no legal obligation(thin "town hall" argument or not) to respect free speech, and are absolutely empowered to police content as they see fit. Indeed, thats what this whole discussion is about: creating la
42.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>These are selected due to their immutable nature (religion is a special case I’m not going to explain here) Why did you choose to leave that out? Is it perhaps because it invalidates your entire argument? Freedom of religion and express
43.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
What do you think causes increases/decreases in overdose deaths at scale?
44.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Advertising is literally spam: >Spam: irrelevant or inappropriate messages sent on the internet to a large number of recipients. Social media and the internet is already overrun with spam anyway so its a null point
45.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Both parties have ironically forsaken their core values on this issue of censorship. It used to be the religious conservatives pushing for censorship of offensive speech and liberals fighting back against that. Freedom of expression is a fu
46.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
That was the excuse private business owners used to refuse service to people based on their race or sexual orientation
47.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Dave Chappelle: if MLK had a sneaker deal with Nike https://youtu.be/4Doo9kOTuUk
48.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
A more generous interpretation is "no ads allowed" means the platform is not funded by advertising, but by public dollars. That way the system design does not become so maliciously driven by engagement/addiction metrics
49.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
2020 set the record for the largest increase in overdose deaths in history. Are you implying that had nothing to do with the socioeconomic situation unique to that year?
50.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
> 2018 and 2019 were a bit anomalous, but if you look at the CDC data is is quite clear that there is nothing unexpected about that number and if you were in 2015 and guessing what the 2020 numbers would be then 90k would be a safe bet.
51.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>But I DON'T see how stimulating your nervous system this way will do what ADHD medication actually does: Inhibit dopamine/norephedrine reuptake / increase dopamine/norephedrine secretion. Why do you assume thats the
52.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
We can't honestly use China as a data point, seeing as how they have been censoring from the beginning, and arresting activists who try to report on covid deaths. https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/profile/
53.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Other than the geriatric and the obese, its the poor who are the most disproportionately hospitalized. Its the poor who are also most harmed by the harsh economic effects of the covid response.
54.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Very interesting. What conclusions can we draw from this?
55.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
The CDC has a history of performing racist medical experiments on unwitting black people: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study The CDC (like the US police and military) also does not keep track of th
56.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Kind of amazing people are still so unaware of the vastly varying relative risk among different demographic groups
57.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
The gaining of strength through adversity and its inverse of atrophy can be found in countless places throughout nature, biology, and human history. There's nothing mythical about that. Take a cat that has lived an easy life indoors it
58.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
It's better to have criminals who are only interested in a relatively small payout exposing to the general public how vulnerable critical infrastructure is than people who are interested in causing mass destruction.
59.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Advantages tend to accumulate in life. Those who had the easiest time growing up are often the most stable ones emotionally. Life doesn’t care about fairness, just like being and tall and attractive is correlated with intelligence, even
60.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Locking people up for doing drugs is a moral travesty. Locking people up for doing drugs while you also do drugs is... just like, entirely beyond the pale. We've had multiple recent presidents and vice presidents who have used ille

More ›