Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lousken
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
631.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
https://i.imgur.com/H5O4ePI.png yup
632.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
can't replicate either with firefox 70 even with devtools off and all my blockers off, don't see any animations
633.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
Personally, I am for DST only. As a night owl seeing dawn at 3am during summer sounds horrible to me.
634.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
EU shouldn't have agreed to this, either leave now or never
635.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
old news? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19986910
636.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
I would never install solar panels on my roof, if it catches on fire, firefighters will let the whole house burn.
637.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
Obviously, the point is to screw up the customers - every DRM can and will be broken at some point
638.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
I've tried XFCE and thunar(both of which are incredibly fast and I loved them), but I've switched to KDE this year because there was always one annoying bug (last one was with large screenshots https://news.ycombinator.
639.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
No, I'm coming from the other way - if I have 6700k OC'ed to 4.6Ghz, 32GBs of RAM and an SSD, i want all these basic apps to show up instantaneously. I think I've payed enough money for this kind of experience not to suck. Al
640.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
Last time I've tried popos the installer didn't allow me to install with custom LVM on LUKS encrypted drive, is that fixed now?
641.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
for me KDE plasma isn't sluggish but cold starting apps like dolphin is significantly slower than xfce's thunar, thunar it's pretty much instant while dolphin is about 1.5s
642.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
in which part of Prague have you been?
643.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
so they're forcing people to pirate their software? interesting
644.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
readable version https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1178308065268920320.html
645.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
evolution since it supports exchange
646.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
aren't you still sending your data to unregulated third party with any ISP? (i dont live in the US so i am not aware if they're regulated in this regard)
647.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
As a sysadmin and a user i dont see any problems with DoH, i can easily set a DNS entry[0] so that FF respects my company configuration. And as a user I've been using DoH for months, just not from cloudflare but from CZ NIC because the
648.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
Not always true, if you message them directly and ask them nicely they'll switch to https. I've even messaged a few to switch from TLS 1.0 to 1.2 as it will be soon obsolete. About 80% of those I asked switched so I am calling it
649.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
I had to use 64kbps internet on vacation for last couple of years, it's rough but it's possible. RSS everything and then use Inoreader mobile and read it there. Unfortunately more and more websites use javascript for content and t
650.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
Yes but it'll be left to sysadmins on which sites to enable this mode - "Microsoft Edge uses your existing Enterprise Mode Site List to identify sites which require IE rendering and simply switches to Internet Explorer mode behind
651.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
False - https://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2019/05/06/edge-chromium... they're bringing IE mode to Edge Chromium
652.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
There are but the thing is - vsync is a trade-off in itself. That's why there're variable refreshrate monitors with freesync and gsync, so obviously the better solution is to use them. But intel needs to support those first. Until
653.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
cat > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf <<'_EOF' Section "Device" Identifier "Intel Graphics" Driver "intel" Option "AccelMethod" "sna"
654.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
> The clipboard failing on large chunks of data has been fixed too. That's awesome, I'll try again with new xubuntu, hopefully there won't be such nasty bug, or do you recommend another distro?
655.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
I remember it was around the time the work started on porting to gtk3, maybe it wasn't tied directly into it but I remember it was xubuntu 16.04 that released really buggy thunar version that shouldn't have been released to LTS. I
656.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
I haven't dig into it that much but I can quote from their blog posts > Many Xfce 4.13 components have been added or updated, providing an updated snapshot of Xfce 4.14 development. [0] https://xubuntu.org/news/
657.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
Also not OP but the window management in lxde felt a lot like windows xp. You couldn't even snap applications to one side.
658.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
I used to really like XFCE and it was my daily driver on my laptop for 6years because it was no compromises on performance type of GUI. Also worked amazing in VMs if you needed to test something and WSL on windows didn't exist. But the
659.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
I wonder how's the performance compared to ext4. I've only seen some old articles and not sure if it's comparable to the latest version
660.
▲
by
lousken
7y ago
HN hug of death? https://archive.is/VVpgQ I just hope they gonna keep memory footprint as low as possible so I can keep bashing electron devs.
More ›