Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
louisswiss
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
31.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Interesting. I’ve never heard that before, but I have heard them called Einkaufspanzer (shopping tanks) several times. The implication being it’s the tank you use to do your grocery shopping in.
32.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Common advice is you only have to be good at either hiring slowly or firing early. Google, for example, was apparently very good at hiring (slowly) - at least in their early days. So it didn't matter that they were (are?) terrible
33.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Yep - A willingness to hire slower and fire earlier would be much better advice.
34.
▲
I have my first few customers, now what?
(anchor.fm)
2 points
by
louisswiss
7y ago
|
0 comments
35.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
I've found it relatively easy (and very quick) to get something up and running with Firestore/Firebase and React.js.
36.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
A cynic would say that's the kind of reasoning that leads to the whole "I once knew a woman who swallowed a fly..." set of scenarios...
37.
▲
What can an early-stage founder learn from a full-time salesperson?
(podhunt.app)
2 points
by
louisswiss
7y ago
|
0 comments
38.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Not sure where you are in Europe, but in Switzerland this is perfectly legal. I was employed on a Zero-hour contract as a bartender for much of my time in higher education.
39.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
If that's your worldview, how do you feel about income tax?
40.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
I've built and sold a few companies doing enterprise sales. Now I run a small course teaching founders the basics of early stage sales. Won't plug that here, but I think you'd get a lot out of this interview I did with Stepha
41.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Sure. They talk about physical harm and abuse in the study, and it's obviously an important factor. I haven't (and wouldn't) claim otherwise. But I was specifically asking the OP about murder because it isn't obvious
42.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
> 0.001% of US women is somewhere in the six-figures territory (125,000 per year if I do my math right) No - you're off by two orders of magnitude. Much closer to ~1500 women/year. That's still ~1500 too many, no question.
43.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
> wondering whether their sample acknowledges the disproportionate number of men who murder their ex-female-partner Curious how this is relevant to the study? Roughly 0.001% of women are killed by a male partner each year in the US and
44.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
I run Sales for Founders ( https://salesforfounders.com ) - a course where I teach (mainly technical) founders just enough about sales to find their first customers and grow to $10k MRR. Since starting work on the course in May, I
45.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Presumably about $370 million.
46.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
A simple answer could be opportunity costs. Lambda is oversubscribed and places are limited, so by accepting a place and then dropping out, Lambda is stuck with nearly all of the same costs as if you had completed the course, which they cou
47.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
I’m Sorry I Haven’t A Clue (the panelshow in question) is still going today! Although the original host sadly passed away a few years ago, and many of the original cast are well into their 80s...
48.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Love what you're trying to achieve here. My main worry is how you can do this at a non-net-negative return for your fund while also not coming across as predatory to the people you're trying to help. > We often talk about ‘boot
49.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Which part of the EU are you based in? There are multiple options available to people in your situation depending on your country of residence.
50.
▲
Why you don't have any customers, with Rob Fitzpatrick, author of 'the Mom Test'
(salesforfounders.com)
1 points
by
louisswiss
7y ago
|
0 comments
51.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Check out Lambda School
52.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
When I read your original comment, I commented because the point I wanted to make seemed interesting (to me at least) and worth making. On re-reading, I understand how it may have come across as less of an "interesting observation"
53.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
I'm sure you have, and there's no doubt in my mind he deserves the backlash he's getting. Did you disagree with the point I made in some way, or was this just the most convenient outlet for some keyboard banging?
54.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
No, of course not. That's the thing about local maxima - when you're in one, it isn't obvious . Instead, the burden is on others to notice and speak up. You may not like the Nazi comparison, but it's apt... Especially w
55.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
> At some point, I decided that it might be better for all of our well-being, not to have all the "incorrect" people in my life always annoyed with me. The only problem with that is it's the same excuse a lot of Germans us
56.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
> Was that the problem? One level of abstraction? No, that's not the problem. Take this sentence from your last comment, for example: > You don't have to research Stallman for long to encounter a whole bunch of people (women
57.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
> they push people away by poisoning the context making it impossible to interact unless you "tolerate" their behavior. I very rarely comment on these kind of threads, but this quote is a perfect example of an unfortunate epide
58.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
I assume the upvoters managed to overcome the massive obstacle of clicking once to hide the advert, went on to read the article anyway, and decided it was worth even the major inconvenience of that extra click to other readers.
59.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
Why would it be a good thing to redefine "strong"? Or why do I think that's the most plausible explanation for an unlikely event?
60.
▲
by
louisswiss
7y ago
If that's true, it'll be because the word "strong" is redefined. I'm genuinely undecided as to whether that's a good thing or not.
More ›