lotusss

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lotusss 8y ago

   > Tell me, how does an article like this improve the actual problem at hand at all? Arguably very few articles improve problems at hand, but for over a quarter of the US population, marijuana is legal recreationally. In Canada, marijuana
2. 2.▲
   by lotusss 8y ago

   I think it's the opposite. You're reading too much into the article. Marijuana has a reputation amongst advocates of being a miracle cure-all for all the world's ailments and no downsides. This article is asking the question-
3. 3.▲
   by lotusss 8y ago

   But you're deflecting from a conversation that's just about enumerating the risks. We don't know the risks from consuming marijuana (aside from anecdotes, but I've got a good sense of the risk from personal consumption a
4. 4.▲
   by lotusss 8y ago

   Your logic is forcing me to draw parallels with marijuana that I don't want to, but this reasoning is not very persuasive. Why shouldn't safety be a requirement for something to be legal? Should drunk driving be legal? Should firi
5. 5.▲
   by lotusss 8y ago

   I don't think this article has advocated in any way that you should lose your choice to consume marijuana. Rather, they are advocating that the fundamental conversation around marijuana legalisation--something roughly resembling "