lorenzoguerra

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lorenzoguerra 7mo ago

   I believe that this choice is due to two main reasons. First, it's (obviously) a marketing strategy to keep the spotlight on their own models, showing they're constantly improving and avoiding validating competitors. Second, since
2. 2.▲
   by lorenzoguerra 7mo ago

   it's 100% for what they call "deep scan", it's 66.7% for the "automatic scan". Practically unusable anyway
3. 3.▲
   by lorenzoguerra 7mo ago

   >We also ran the full dataset of 263 URLs (254 phishing, 9 confirmed legitimate) through Muninn's automatic scan. This is the scan that runs on every page you visit without any action on your part. On its own, the automatic scan cor
4. 4.▲
   by lorenzoguerra 7mo ago

   I cannot bring myself to trust unreviewed software enough to install it on my own machine with arbitrary permissions. I understand the push for AI-generated websites, because the code running in my browser's sandbox is gonna have very